Does anybody here take the Greens seriously?

[the snail]

So where are they going to get cocaine and heroin from?

Pharmaceutical companies? The NHS already buys pharmaceutical heroin, morphine, cocaine etc. If the supply chain is legal, they don't have to buy drugs on a street corner. It's really not that complicated.

 

[CXRAndy]

So just replacement of street pusher to government pusher.

 

[CXRAndy]

The Green candidate has a tidy property portfolio.

Thought Greens were against landlords?

Very hypocritical of Green candidate if true, saying that I seem to remember some other 'Green' on here having 3 or more properties.

They couldn't square away the hypocrisy either

 

[monkers]

So just replacement of street pusher to government pusher.

Just gish gallop from the far right. If you said you'd studied the subject, nobody would believe you. What is the detail of the Green's policy?

 

[monkers]

The Green candidate has a tidy property portfolio.

Thought Greens were against landlords?

Very hypocritical of Green candidate if true, saying that I seem to remember some other 'Green' on here having 3 or more properties.

They couldn't square away the hypocrisy either

We know who you are speaking of. I seem to remember you claiming that she lived in a squalid basement when it suited you. Now you are discontent because you now realise she had wealth. However your view is that as a Green she should not have had wealth. - too undeserving.

Just about all of your assumptions about her are false. You designed and pushed a persona of her around a sneering narrative, and here it is again now.

 

[CXRAndy]

In not bothered if you have wealth. Its the hypocritical stance

 

[monkers]

In not bothered if you have wealth. Its the hypocritical stance

The Greens never say that all wealth is obscene. They do not say that profit is sin. What they say is that the wealth gap is obscene when people are homeless, starving or otherwise vulnerable. They have policies, but you've never read them.

Your content here is not concerned with truth or understanding, it is just a mix of boastfulness, condescension and malice.

The Greens are a people first party - you are a you-centric person - Thatcher's child.

 

[C R]

The Greens never say that all wealth is obscene. They do not say that profit is sin. What they say is that the wealth gap is obscene when people are homeless, starving or otherwise vulnerable. They have policies, but you've never read them.

Your content here is not concerned with truth or understanding, it is just a mix of boastfulness, condescension and malice.

The Greens are a people first party - you are a you-centric person - Thatcher's child.

Do you still labour under the illusion that facts matter?

 

[monkers]

mIn not bothered if you have wealth. Its the hypocritical stance

Not bothered, but thinks it important enough to keep banging on about on a cycling forum.

You are making claims against Hannah Spencer - where is the evidence? Everything you say is to do with malice.

 

[monkers]

Do you still labour under the illusion that facts matter?

I know, such a trivial thing to get fixated on.

 

[Shortfall]

Not bothered, but thinks it important enough to keep banging on about on a cycling forum.

You are making claims against Hannah Spencer - where is the evidence? Everything you say is to do with malice.

Didn't you block Andy as well.as Spen? You mustn't have been logged in again. Or something 😉

 

[monkers]

Didn't you block Andy as well.as Spen? You mustn't have been logged in again. Or something 😉

It's complicated! Ask me a more interesting question.

 

[Shortfall]

It's complicated! Ask me a more interesting question.

Ok. Should the BBC make It Ain't Half Hot Mum available on iPlayer?

 

[monkers]

Ok. Should the BBC make It Ain't Half Not Mum available on iPlayer?

You want me to think about the commercial decisions of the BBC?

On a philosophical level, yes I think that if they thought that the best commercial decision then they should be able to put it on iplayer.

While we are exchanging random points of view, I don't think they should impose a licence fee for it, so I'd rather historic content was on youtube.

 

[CXRAndy]

Since Monker reincarnation.

They have detailed knowledge of posts going back years.

Now, either they are one and the same or I was hot topic of just about every conversation.

Oh I'm never on ignore too