Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
C R

C R

Veteran
It might be worth less, he has said he bought it high , wanted a free speech platform. I think he can afford it.

ITYM freeze peach platform. Regarding the value, those who funded the purchase may not be that sanguine.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside

CXRAndy

Well-Known Member
No it's not. I've said before what he stated.

The only negative point you cling onto is the value of the company has gone down. I agree it has.

But he still has a profitable company. If the figures are correct double the profits compared to pre Musk
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
No it's not. I've said before what he stated.

The only negative point you cling onto is the value of the company has gone down. I agree it has.

But he still has a profitable company. If the figures are correct double the profits compared to pre Musk

You wrote this:

"If X has maintained or increased profits amid the lefts onslaught to de-advertise the platform, convert it from left wing to right wing. Then that is remarkable successful business strategy"

It hasn't.

By all means, use Musk and Trump as bastions of bigly financial wisdom. That business class flight ain't gonna play for itself.
 

Psamathe

Well-Known Member
Don’t know if it is still the case, but, there was a period when UK had several million more NHI numbers in circulation, than there was population.
When emigrated and lived overseas (paying tax, social charge, etc. in my country of residence) I kept my UK NI number despite not being counted in the UK population. Same for my brother when he emigrated yo Australia. My understanding is that it's standard practice for expats to keep their NI number.

I'd guess same applies to any non-British citizens who come and work in UK then move out of UK.

I have several "NI numbers" a UK one, a French one and a Netherlands one ie all the countries I've lived and worked in.

That should account for a fair number of NI numbers outside of population count.

Ian
 

Bazzer

Well-Known Member
This is another reason why democrats are trying to block DOGE for looking at social security and other departments.

You can have literally tens of thousands of illegal immigrants with the same Social security number


View: https://x.com/Real_RobN/status/1888722651893694672?t=mVzYp5UbroA7IvfU226TKw&s=19

And the same sh1te keeps being repeated ad nauseum, despite audits showing this is false. Straight out of the orange rapist's playbook. Keep repeating something and the hard of thinking/CBA to think, will believe it is true.
BTW it was a judge who blocked access to the records, not the Democrats.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
When emigrated and lived overseas (paying tax, social charge, etc. in my country of residence) I kept my UK NI number despite not being counted in the UK population. Same for my brother when he emigrated yo Australia. My understanding is that it's standard practice for expats to keep their NI number.

I'd guess same applies to any non-British citizens who come and work in UK then move out of UK.

I have several "NI numbers" a UK one, a French one and a Netherlands one ie all the countries I've lived and worked in.

That should account for a fair number of NI numbers outside of population count.

Ian

Yes, I am aware of the "ex-pat NI Number" factor. The allegedly large number of fake NI number in circulation was a "big thing", often reported on by Computer Weekly (who also commented quite extensively on the Horizon system). The NI number thing wa sway back in the past, 1970s, I would guess, I even briefly worked on a project to sift through the data, but, as a freelance, I worked on numerous projects in UK and overseas, and do not recall precisely when this (NI) one was. I wasn't saying there WAS fraud, simply, that such a "mismatch" was quite widely reported, at the time.
 

craigwend

Do you Remember
IMG_4345.jpeg
 
Top Bottom