briantrumpet
Veteran
A week is a long time in Trump's addled brain.
So I looked at an NI calculator, and $7500 is about £5600. You pay that much employee NI on a salary of about £180k. Well done Stevo.
If you are thinking of total contributions, you get to that level at a salary of more like £40k, (the total for £180k being more like £20k.)
I suppose the question is whether that's causing wage suppression, and if so by how much. Hard to know really, without comparing what you get for your £5600 in the US, so you know how much the equivalent to NHS cover would cost. The cost for comparison is also going to be wildly different if you have dependents, because for two kids your bill is more like £15k in the US isn't it.
Your notional £180k earner (let's call them Stevo or Stevette) is probably going to end up subsidizing others. So is that the sort of society you want to live in, or do you prefer the eat what you kill society in the US?
I'm lost in numbers. The median earner in the UK, roughly £28-£30k, roughly accounts for the average cost of the NHS per capita. And the NHS gets about 5 times as much from general taxation from that average earner (extremely roughly). Are there really 5 non earners for every earner in the UK?
That is because the numbers will always fail to spot the very thing we know - that tax in the UK is raised under the ethos of acceptance of collective responsibility under an essentially socialist structure. Those who don't wish to contribute tend to cite numbers that reflect transactional analysis - they don't accept the premise that we are all responsible for the elderly, those who can't work, those temporarily out of work, and children. All they see are their spreadsheets of income and expenditure with other people on and become bitter about it. The 'not my kids' is a principle argument, soon forgotten by the expectation of a state pension while conveniently forgetting that it is funded by other people's children once they in turn are working.
Monkers niece, N is now posting using Monkers account. I think she initially intended only to post to let us know the news and answer any questions, but is possibly now enjoying it while she sorts out the estate.Soory, I neust have to ask this, but, are you posting from beyond the grave? We were told in mid June that you had "passed" (to use the modern parlance) but, it would appear, you are still posting from the after life. My apologies for being direct, but, this is important to me, I may need to make last minute adjustments to my lifestyle, if, in fact there are pearly gates, or whatever, I may even to need to make a quick switch of religious "belief".
Monkers niece, N is now posting using Monkers account. I think she initially intended only to post to let us know the news and answer any questions, but is possibly now enjoying it while she sorts out the estate.
Okay, well,.in that case the numbers are off somewhere, because the US spends more on healthcare per capita than we do and has worse outcomes. $7500 per head doesn't come close.
Yes I get all that, but there are more than three people working for every reitree, and fewer than one child. I think. So the numbers don't add up.
I thought this thread was about the orange shitgibbon.
It is.
There's a separate thread for general healthcare discussion, which might well include US die-if-you're-poor observations. https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/healthcare-models.757/
I actually thought we were on that thread tbh. As it happens I'm bored now.
If the shitgibbon goes to Ailsa Craig it's to retrieve a ball he shanked of the tee. But that's not going to happen, because one of his personal guards has a supply of balls to ensure every drive landed on the fairway. They do a similar thing by putting loads of flags on each green so he ends up close to one of them.
What?! He can barely drive 50yds.
It is.
There's a separate thread for general healthcare discussion, which might well include US die-if-you're-poor observations. https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/healthcare-models.757/