Blazing Saddles
Active Member
Hang on while I use google translate.
Donald I, emperor of the world.
- Thread starter C R
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Hang on while I use google translate.
Xipe Totec
Something nasty in the woodshed
I think by now MAGAndy's only lying to himself.
secretsqirrel
Well-Known Member
Pie…..
Xipe Totec
Something nasty in the woodshed
Milzy
Senior Member
You need to go to spec savers. Unless you’ve watched a different video that is.
Could have shot her tires instead of murdering her in cold blood.
Beebo
Guru
"The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart".
Yeah, you keep saying that JD, if it helps you sleep at night.
Mad Doug Biker
Just plodding along as always.
- Location
- Over there, somewhere.
What I'd like to know is, could she have survived if they had let the Doctor see to her earlier (I know a head wound is pretty serious and maybe she was already fatally wounded), and regardless of whether it was a split second decision by the agent, the aftermath just shows the amount of intent - This was no accident or chance encounter, I don't mean it like they went out to kill, but the aftermath is somewhat revealing, I mean, were they making sure she was too far gone before leaving? How long will it take to assess that a woman shot in the head is no longer a 'threat', (unless the others in car were - They were probably more understandably upset than anything else I'd imagine )? Why did they run away, etc 🤔
In other words, how long was she left before help arrived?
Also, I bet the guy responsible will get away with it too. 🙄
EDIT Badly written, I know. It was written in bits earlier.
In other words, how long was she left before help arrived?
Also, I bet the guy responsible will get away with it too. 🙄
EDIT Badly written, I know. It was written in bits earlier.
Last edited:
Bazzer
Über Member
The latest dictator appointed US Attorney to be deemed unlawfully serving is John Sarcone, who was acting in the Northern District of New York.
Consequently, the subpoenas served by him on Letitia James, which were spite for her long running battle with the NRA, are now binned.
https://www.democracydocket.com/new...-u-s-attorney-john-sarcone-northern-new-york/
Consequently, the subpoenas served by him on Letitia James, which were spite for her long running battle with the NRA, are now binned.
https://www.democracydocket.com/new...-u-s-attorney-john-sarcone-northern-new-york/
Last edited:
TailWindHome
Regular
I understand you may all have questions regarding this officer's conduct....would you feel more comfortable if I tell you that he has 'absolute immunity'?
Mad Doug Biker
Just plodding along as always.
- Location
- Over there, somewhere.
Wow, but no real surprise I guess.
Beebo
Guru
First Aspect
Guru
From Google - this is the shred of truth that this particular lie is built upon....
Qualified immunity is a judicially created legal doctrine in the U.S. that shields government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits unless their conduct violates a "clearly established statutory or constitutional right".
How It Works
When a law enforcement officer is sued for an alleged civil rights violation, typically under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a judge applies a two-part test to determine if qualified immunity applies:
Did the official violate a constitutional right? The court first determines if the facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, show a violation occurred.
Was the right "clearly established" at the time of the incident? If a violation occurred, the court then assesses if the right was clear enough that every reasonable official would have known their actions were unlawful.
If either condition is not met, the officer is immune from the lawsuit and the case is dismissed, often before a trial or discovery process begins. The "clearly established" standard often requires victims to point to a previous court case with nearly identical facts, a challenging requirement for plaintiffs.
Arguments For and Against
Qualified immunity is a subject of significant controversy.
Proponents argue it protects officers from frivolous lawsuits and financial burdens, allowing them "breathing room" to make necessary, split-second decisions in high-stress situations without fear of personal financial ruin.
Critics argue the doctrine has become an "absolute shield" that prevents accountability for police misconduct and brutality, even in egregious cases where no exact prior precedent exists. They note that officers are almost always indemnified by their employing agency for damages, meaning they rarely pay out-of-pocket regardless of the lawsuit's outcome.
State-Level Reforms
While qualified immunity is a federal doctrine, some states have passed laws that limit its application for claims brought in state courts.
Colorado, Montana, Nevada, and New Mexico have banned the use of qualified immunity as a defense for law enforcement officers in state-level civil rights lawsuits.
Other states like Connecticut and New York City have created new civil causes of action or otherwise limited governmental immunity in their jurisdictions.
Federal legislation to modify or abolish the doctrine has been proposed in the U.S. Congress, but as of late 2025, has generally stalled.
clearly established - Congress.gov
* Incidents involving the use of force by law enforcement, such as the 2020 death of George Floyd and the 2023 death of Tyre Nichols, have raised questions rega...
Congress.gov
Qualified immunity: What is it, and how does it work? - Police1
17 Apr 2025 — The concept of qualified immunity still occasionally confuses members of the public. While they may know it shields government actors like police fro...
Police1
What is Qualified Immunity? FAQ and Impact - Legal Defense Fund
Qualified Immunity FAQ * What is qualified immunity? Qualified immunity is a judge-created rule that protects government officials, including police officers, w...
Legal Defense Fund
Qualified Immunity - National Conference of State Legislatures
18 Dec 2025 — The Supreme Court has held that use of force by police and correctional officers violates the Fourth Amendment when it is “excessive.” Police and cor...
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
qualified immunity | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
qualified immunity * Qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plai...
LII | Legal Information Institute
Qualified Immunity State Reforms - The Institute for Justice
Qualified Immunity State Reforms. “Qualified immunity” is a legal shield the U.S. Supreme Court created that protects all government officials (not just police ...
The Institute for Justice
Part IX Qualified Immunity - Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers
1. Did a Constitutional Violation Occur? The first element is whether the officer violated a constitutional right, under the plaintiff's version of the facts. 1...
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) (.gov)
Qualified Immunity - National Association of Attorneys General
17 Dec 2025 — Qualified immunity is a judicially established doctrine designed to protect public officials from liability when performing acts necessary in their j...
National Association of Attorneys General
Qualified Immunity - Equal Justice Initiative
Qualified Immunity. This legal doctrine limits legal remedies for victims of police violence or misconduct. ... Americans were first empowered to challenge poli...
Equal Justice Initiative
Policing the Police: Qualified Immunity and Considerations for ...
9 Jun 2020 — Qualified immunity is a judicially created doctrine shielding public officials who are performing discretionary functions from civil liability. The do...
Congress.gov
Qualified immunity - Wikipedia
Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [8] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (197...
Wikipedia
Qualified Immunity – When Public Officials Are Sued
4 Sept 2023 — Since police are public officials, the doctrine of qualified immunity can protect law enforcement in civil lawsuits. Many times, lawsuits against pol...
Pappalardo & Pappalardo LLP
Beebo
Guru
That seems to be a civil defence not a criminal defence.
Pblakeney
Guru
First Aspect
Guru
I know. But if you distort it far enough it becomes both.
