Of all papers (and I cannot stand the Mail), they are really pushing the Epstein story.
There is evidence of this. It's not the figment of an evil editors imagination.
View attachment 12893
Here’s more potential evidence.
Teenage girls encrypted diary that was translated.
From about the 10 minute mark. Harrowing stuff.
View: https://youtu.be/T2sdankrW6Q?si=ycVBKwMvZWwDvzYw
As per the question in that image. Why are those people's names being redacted?
To hide the identity of "good people"? For fear of a law suit? Sod them. Facts are facts.
The DOJ are doing something illegal - redacting the names of the perpetrators but revealing the names of victims.
But the victims aren't Republicans, so that's OK.
But the victims aren't Republicans, so that's OK.
I don't think that has much to do with it. I think of you are rich, no matter your political bent, you think you are above the law.
“The wealthiest 1% are protected by the law, but are not bound by it. The bottom 99% are bound by the law, but are not protected by it.” - Scott Galloway
I think I may have alluded to this before on a thread, but it is now obvious that the secret paedophile ring was not a lunatic conspiracy, they just got the wrong political party at the heart of it.