F**cking idiot Shadow Cabinet- Lisa 'halfwit' Nandy

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Craig the cyclist

Über Member
When questioned on the upcoming rail strike Lisa 'dimwit' Nandy is quite clear whose side she is on, unequivocal you may say. She is definitely on the side of the public "we’re on the public’s side on this", at least in the first half of the sentence. She is also quite sure who else's side the Labour party are on "We’re also on the rail workers’ side".

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...lisa-nandy-comes-out-in-support-of-rmt-strike

Oh, and her pronouncement that the strikes should go ahead (The Guardians words, not mine) put her at the other end of the platform from the Labour leader who has said that the strikes should not go ahead.

So complete clarity from the Labour party on this issue, they back it, but not, and back the public not the rail workers except when backing them both. Thank christ they are not actually running things.
 
Rail workers are the public. HTH.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
When questioned on the upcoming rail strike Lisa 'dimwit' Nandy is quite clear whose side she is on, unequivocal you may say. She is definitely on the side of the public "we’re on the public’s side on this", at least in the first half of the sentence. She is also quite sure who else's side the Labour party are on "We’re also on the rail workers’ side".

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...lisa-nandy-comes-out-in-support-of-rmt-strike

Oh, and her pronouncement that the strikes should go ahead (The Guardians words, not mine) put her at the other end of the platform from the Labour leader who has said that the strikes should not go ahead.

So complete clarity from the Labour party on this issue, they back it, but not, and back the public not the rail workers except when backing them both. Thank christ they are not actually running things.
Feck the Labour leadership there weak....they should be 100% behind the unions and workers on this ! Yet again we hear the usual drival from the media coverage of the RMT strikes ! fark the workers it's the poor old public we feel for.
It's so scary someone being paid a decent wage isn't it ?
You've spoilt yourself with a Guardian link aswell Craigy....whatever next 🙄
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
We can be clear at least where the right wing media stand on this ffs.
Screenshot_20220610-142927.png
 
When questioned on the upcoming rail strike Lisa 'dimwit' Nandy is quite clear whose side she is on, unequivocal you may say. She is definitely on the side of the public "we’re on the public’s side on this", at least in the first half of the sentence. She is also quite sure who else's side the Labour party are on "We’re also on the rail workers’ side".

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...lisa-nandy-comes-out-in-support-of-rmt-strike

Oh, and her pronouncement that the strikes should go ahead (The Guardians words, not mine) put her at the other end of the platform from the Labour leader who has said that the strikes should not go ahead.

So complete clarity from the Labour party on this issue, they back it, but not, and back the public not the rail workers except when backing them both. Thank christ they are not actually running things.

As ever you choose(?) to see these things in binary terms. It's perfectly possible to support the rail workers claims for better pay (and no reductions in workforce or pensions) AND express the hope that the impact on the public is limited.

The Guardian is quoting an interview she gave with Good Morning Britain; it's not their interview. I cannot make out where she says the strikes should go ahead.

It's perfectly possible for her views to differ from those of Keir Starmer; there's a margin of appreciation in these matters.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
As ever you choose(?) to see these things in binary terms. It's perfectly possible to support the rail workers claims for better pay (and no reductions in workforce or pensions) AND express the hope that the impact on the public is limited.

The Guardian is quoting an interview she gave with Good Morning Britain; it's not their interview. I cannot make out where she says the strikes should go ahead.

It's perfectly possible for her views to differ from those of Keir Starmer; there's a margin of appreciation in these matters.

If the impact on the Public is limited, doesn't that make the strike ineffective, and, hence, rather pointless?
 
Top Bottom