Eh?
I referenced activity not thought. If you have a point please make it.
I'm also enjoying the Nothing to See Here alliance between Rusty and Multz.
LOL. I don't think it needs me to do any forging. And (whilst obviously I don't like Caplin, on account of him being an odious shit), "politicians I don't like" is not the correct metric, as well you know. But I love how you've backed yourself into a corner where you have to stand up for these MFs.
I'm also enjoying the Nothing to See Here alliance between Rusty and Multz. 🤣
That's even worse, isn't it? Almost all of the followers screenshotted are likely to have social media teams.
Most activity is preceded by thought.
Is she being criticised for an oversight, which seems harsh, or for being aware and deliberately not unfollowing him.
(This is getting bad now. I am actually discussing this claptrap 'crime'. It's as relevant and meaningless as discussing the motivations of those people on The Traitors.)
Considering the content of Caplin’s account, I’m expressing surprise that prominent people, politicians in particular, followed him. I didn’t bring up Rayner as an example, Multi did.
If you're a public figure then you ought to be careful about what your public social media shows.
Does that extend to being aware of every single post or reply made by every single one of the 5000 people you follow?
This seems to be what Claude and Glasgow are suggesting.
You wouldn’t need to see every post but there’s a high enough volume of dodgy material that would make you question the wisdom of following him.
If you're a public figure then you ought to be careful about what your public social media shows.
It's still a ridiculous notion to vilify people on the basis of who they follow. You've no idea why anyone follows anyone unless they specifically tell you.