AuroraSaab
Squire
No they aren't. You are posting increasingly bizarre things. You'd also keep Freud busy, I suspect.
Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
No they aren't. You are posting increasingly bizarre things. You'd also keep Freud busy, I suspect.
icowden
Legendary Member
It seems to be you who has the recall issue. Search for the word "thermal" on the thread. It was CRXAndy who went down that route and multitool who suggested thermal imaging. As far as I can see @AuroraSaab didn't even comment on it.
classic33
Me
I never said she did. Ally, now gone, was what said. Is he still here, or has he gone?
AuroraSaab
Squire
I have never once interacted with Andy as far as I know, nor liked his posts. Classic's ludicrous claim that I said I'd take photos in changing rooms with little girls present, and Andy would be in there with a thermal imaging camera, are just his bizarre fictions. I used to think these bonkers assertions were due to poor comprehension skills, now I think it's just an increasingly weird attempt at mud slinging.
monkers
Legendary Member
First of all, I'm not the one who said it. Secondly N didn't just make you the subject of a tongue-in-cheek remark, but herself too.
How much did you pay for the sense of humour bypass?
AuroraSaab
Squire
I think you channel imaginary characters better than Derek Acorah. I guess you didn't go down the 2 account route because it would be time consuming logging in and out and you might slip up and forget which persona you were supposed to be. Good plan; you find it hard enough to be consistent as it is.
monkers
Legendary Member
Given your record of replying to just about every post that anybody else makes on the subject, you probably rate yourself as super human. I on the other hand consider you non-human.
One of your favourite words is 'obvious'. What is obvious to me is that the one person your refuse to engage with is the human rights lawyer on the thread, pretending instead that they don't exist! How utterly cowardly of you.
AuroraSaab
Squire
As we've been over the same stuff a million times it's neither here nor there whether I reply to your made up niece, who you created to present as some sort of legal authority to back up your claims, or not.
If I do reply to The Imaginary Niece be clear: I'm replying to you.
Back pre Naca the plea to authority was to your lawyer cousin. No lawyer niece in sight back then.
If I do reply to The Imaginary Niece be clear: I'm replying to you.
Back pre Naca the plea to authority was to your lawyer cousin. No lawyer niece in sight back then.
monkers
Legendary Member
There are three lawyers in my family. I probably mentioned that before. My cousin that I mentioned is a family solicitor. My niece is a barrister, but currently working in Strasbourg. If you had half a brain you'd realise that she only posts when she is home with me some weekends.
You like to pretend to that she doesn't exist because she has you hopelessly outclassed. You are afraid to engage with her in conversation despite the fact that she never been anything but polite towards you despite all of your ongoing bigotry that you direct to the trans community.
Last edited:
AuroraSaab
Squire
As we've been over the Equality Act umpteen times I've covered every comment already.
All your comments are contradicted by UK legal experts so I'm calling bullsh#t on any legal expertise you present on here, regardless of where you pretend it comes from.
I think in future I'll just post screenshots, save myself a bit of time. Legal experts on equality law:
You can keep blathering on about the United Nations and human rights if you like.
All your comments are contradicted by UK legal experts so I'm calling bullsh#t on any legal expertise you present on here, regardless of where you pretend it comes from.
I think in future I'll just post screenshots, save myself a bit of time. Legal experts on equality law:
You can keep blathering on about the United Nations and human rights if you like.
classic33
Me
dutchguylivingintheuk
Über Member
B. has an title too you know, it's the masters of words that fly like birds, is B. B the beatmaster he is only part time when the power of the typed out word come in to act, and B. has to react to this situation. It just so happen to be, like a calling for the B.
What a load of Bullshite, you all but polite? you don't remember what you write do you?
monkers
Legendary Member
This is not evidence that blanket bans are permissible. You are failing.
monkers
Legendary Member
I can't understand a word of anything you say. Stop wasting people's time with this idiocy.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Nobody has ever claimed there is a blanket ban on trans identifying people which is available in law.
It is however permissible to exclude on the basis of biological sex, regardless of whether that person is trans identifying or not.
You keep banging on about blanket bans of trans identifying people. This is because you want to make it appear that trans identifying people are being unfairly discriminated against. In reality it is exclusion on the basis of sex, not for being trans identified.
It is however permissible to exclude on the basis of biological sex, regardless of whether that person is trans identifying or not.
You keep banging on about blanket bans of trans identifying people. This is because you want to make it appear that trans identifying people are being unfairly discriminated against. In reality it is exclusion on the basis of sex, not for being trans identified.
