Gender again. Sorry!

[mickle]

" blah blah ... that I MUST be trans. After being told you were incorrect, you persisted with this line .... blah "

This is your best evidence of me 'harassing' and 'attacking' you?

 

[AndyRM]

It's funny how KJKNMPMKJKJK is cool with adopting names and changing her identity but gets all butthurt when she's called out on her bullsh!t.

 

[monkers]

" blah blah ... that I MUST be trans. After being told you were incorrect, you persisted with this line .... blah "

This is your best evidence of me 'harassing' and 'attacking' you?

Still you persist. The only example I have is of you attacking anywhere, is of you attacking me in the other place. However the Glinner goons have attacked me nastily and relentlessly elsewhere in the past.

You came here boasting that you've been TERFING in other places. I know what that means, and I've seen what you were capable of before in a moderated forum.

I'm confident I have the correct measure of you. It's of no interest to you what cisgender women have been going through over this, because you found an outlet for your hate, and while both trans and cis women have been suffering over this, you celebrate it. That's who haters are, humanoid in form without human qualities, projecting their self-loathing on others. That's the commonality of haters.

 

[Stevo 666]

I see you are amused CXRAbsolutemoronicfarkwit.

This is your level too isn't it, attacking women on the internet to push your agenda of supposedly protecting women.

It's no longer unusual to find those men shouting the loudest about paedophiles are the perpetrators. They shout the loudest to provide a smokescreen to their own activities, dealing with their own mental difficulties.

In your case, I picture you in a grubby basement shouting at women on the internet on one screen while w*nking your pathetically tiny cock as you watch trans porn on another screen. That's just in between reading and believing conspiracies, spreading those and memes dementedly between you other little sessions. Pathetic intellectually stunted runt of a man.

Men like you are the very worst of humanity. In contrast there are very intelligent men on this forum who are absolute gentlemen - that's who the real men are - I don't need to name them.

Monkers, I suggest you try arguing using facts and logic, because this charm offensive of yours isn't really winning over CXRAndy

 

[AuroraSaab]

It's all that transactivists have left. A dismal, pathetic extinction burst, a toddler tantrum that veers from arrogance to foul mouth ranting. It hasn't worked in either winning over people or shutting up women anymore than No Debate did and it's partly responsible for the decline in support for trans people because any reasonable accommodations that people were willing to make were aggressively rejected. Nothing but complete capitulation was ever going to be acceptable.

 

[Stevo 666]

It's all that transactivists have left. A dismal, pathetic extinction burst, a toddler tantrum that veers from arrogance to foul mouth ranting. It hasn't worked in either winning over people or shutting up women anymore than No Debate did and it's partly responsible for the decline in support for trans people because any reasonable accommodations that people were willing to make were aggressively rejected. Nothing but complete capitulation was ever going to be acceptable.

This whole thing has also been a lesson on the dangers of letting a small but gobby minority set the agenda. Fortunately the tide turned in a major way this week.

 

[classic33]

It's all that transactivists have left. A dismal, pathetic extinction burst, a toddler tantrum that veers from arrogance to foul mouth ranting. It hasn't worked in either winning over people or shutting up women anymore than No Debate did and it's partly responsible for the decline in support for trans people because any reasonable accommodations that people were willing to make were aggressively rejected. Nothing but complete capitulation was ever going to be acceptable.

A description of your own posting style.

You can always check back and see what you actually posted. As you were/are fond of telling others.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Please quote the posts where I've called anybody a c.unt, a tw@t, a tw@nt, a dickhead, or any of the other names that men on here have called me. If you're going to make claims like that you should provide the receipts.

 

[mickle]

Still you persist. The only example I have is of you attacking anywhere, is of you attacking me in the other place. However the Glinner goons have attacked me nastily and relentlessly elsewhere in the past.

You came here boasting that you've been TERFING in other places. I know what that means, and I've seen what you were capable of before in a moderated forum.

I'm confident I have the correct measure of you. It's of no interest to you what cisgender women have been going through over this, because you found an outlet for your hate, and while both trans and cis women have been suffering over this, you celebrate it. That's who haters are, humanoid in form without human qualities, projecting their self-loathing on others. That's the commonality of haters.

Good grief. You're wrong. I don't hate anyone, but it suits your argument to claim that i do.

I'm a very left wing, feminist ally raised by feminists. I support the aims and objectives of radical feminism and I marched in solidarity as a straight ally with my gay friends at Pride thirty five years ago. Im absolutely not motivated by hatred, I'm motivated by a strong sense of right and wrong.

I'm open to being persuaded that I'm wrong, but you've said absolutely nothing, nor has any TRA, to convince me. You must know that calling people names; twats c.unts, bigots isn't going to change their position.

It wasn't TERFs marching at Pride SF with trans flag painted baseball bats with barbed wire wrapped round them and wearing T shirts covered in fake TERF blood. The hatred is clearly one sided, and its your farking lot bringing it.

 

[monkers]

The celebrations are going to be short lived.

And surprise, the official attached to the Cabinet Office in 2010 who helped the draft the Bill has been published in The Guardian this evening.

Melanie Fields, who later went on to a hold a senior position at the Commission, and left there in staff exodus in 2023, has revealed the truth.

The role of the Supreme Court was to use their legal competence to determine what the then government has intended, and they failed.

Court ruling on ‘woman’ at odds with UK Equality Act aim, says ex-civil servant​

‘Clear premise’ was to give trans and biological women same sex discrimination rights, says official who helped draft act'


It was as I had said all along. The protected characteristic of sex was intended to dually protect biological woman and trans women with a GRC.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-ex-civil-servant?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

When this gets to the European Court of Human Rights hear the case, and they will, they will quickly give the UK direction. Convention rights will prevail.

 

[monkers]

Good grief. You're wrong. I don't hate anyone, but it suits your argument to claim that i do.

I'm a very left wing, feminist ally raised by feminists. I support the aims and objectives of radical feminism and I marched in solidarity as a straight ally with my gay friends at Pride thirty five years ago. Im absolutely not motivated by hatred, I'm motivated by a strong sense of right and wrong.

I'm open to being persuaded that I'm wrong, but you've said absolutely nothing, nor has any TRA, to convince me. You must know that calling people names; twats c.unts, bigots isn't going to change their position.

It wasn't TERFs marching at Pride SF with trans flag painted baseball bats with barbed wire wrapped round them and wearing T shirts covered in fake TERF blood. The hatred is clearly one sided, and its your farking lot bringing it.

I've had no part in trans activism. The allegation, and a galloping lie is that I've had any involvement in trans activism.

What some trans activists have done is not in my name. So this is whataboutery on stilts and steroids.

My involvement has been on here to expose the lies being told, most often without giving opinion, but quoting the solid legal opinion of others.

The law was readily waived away with a dismissive hand as being irrelevant to their interest, until the Supreme Court ruling of course, then the champagne corks flew didn't they.

There's been plenty of trans hatred on display, and some of that came from you. You didn't care enough to consider what some women were telling you; you were happy to belittle and insult. Trans hate was never a feminist endeavour. Feminism has crossed the floor, it is no longer of the left, it shares its values with fascism. And you are there for it.

And why wouldn't I call you a c*nt? It wouldn't be misplaced.

You chose to attempt to belittle and insult a person with a long history of advocating for human rights for all. That used to be a feminist endeavour.

The Supreme Court ruling won't stand for long, it is ill-founded and most probably because of the collusion of those involved with trans hatred that extends all the way up to members of the present government.

How stupid they and all of you will look when the European Court tears it down; and they will.

 

[classic33]

Please quote the posts where I've called anybody a c.unt, a tw@t, a tw@nt, a dickhead, or any of the other names that men on here have called me. If you're going to make claims like that you should provide the receipts.

I'm using your style here, search your own posts and you'll see where you've been foul mouthed and arrogant in your replies.
After all, as you've said more than once, it can't be that hard, can it!

You're claiming things I've never said, or claimed. Just your foul mouthed rants and belittling style of posting. Which, again is there if you search it.

 

[dutchguylivingintheuk]

Look on the bright side, anyone who has been blocked can dismantle her rants and take the p1ss as much as they want and she has removed her ability to reply 🙂

Saying you have blocked someone and actually blocking someone are two different things. And i have seen many times on this forom someone saying he blocked user X, Y, Z and XX doesn't always means they actually did it.

it is an b*tch move tough.

 

[AndyRM]

I don't think blocking people is a bitch move but I understand why it happens. Equally I don't think asking people to ignore the content of others is all that helpful either (albeit not in this part of the forum but elsewhere).

I dunno, this thread is weird and veers from the interesting to the tedious quite a lot. As far as I know I'm the only active member here who blurs the lines gender wise (in my head, blah blah I don't exist etc) and I know I've said some sh!tty things on here but f*cking hell y'all, we're all humans, be nice if we could just respect each other eh?

 

[monkers]

Melanie Field who was the lead writer has spoken out. The writing team were given a clear brief, that trans people with a GRC were to be protected from discrimination on the basis of their sex. Woman means both biological woman and trans woman with a GRC under the Equality Act.

People who were right.

The staff who called out Falkner for her transphobic behaviour at meetings.

The Commission staff members who made formal complaints about Falkner.

The Commission staff members who left the commission en masse.

The staff members who raised concerned in the Equality office about Truss and Badenoch.

The Scottish Ministers.

The Judges of the Outer and Inner Courts of Session, who ridiculed Falkner for her absurd claims, such as there being a legal definition of 'lesbian' - there isn't.

Liberty International.

Stonewall.

Transactivists funnily enough.

A few good folk on this forum.

My niece.

Me.

And those who got it wrong.

FWS

Sex Matters

JK farkwit Rowling

LGB Alliance

Some actual twats on here.

The Supreme Court - how much egg on their faces tonight?