Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

monkers

Squire
Your case is not wrll stated.

You appear unable to distinguish your dismay at the outcome with the task the Supreme Court has.

Their task as you describe it was to clarify the law.

They have done exactly that.

The fact you don't agree with their decision does not mean the Supreme Court didn't do its task.

Their task was not to make a decision Monjers agrees with

Try challenging the facts instead of manufacturing slights against posters. It's always the same with you, whenever the facts don't suit you seek to belittle the poster.

Did Vera Baird say those words? What message do they convey? That is all that is being asked.
 
What about the results that are false positives? What if a person does have a dsd and a Y chromosome the swab test fails to show? Do we then just go by Tweets made by Musk and Rowling?
What happens in the rare cases when an initial doping test is inconclusive or disputed?

You re test and move to next level testing.

Pretending it's too hard to test the sex of the competitors and therefore the athletes whose sex is disputed - which is invariably males in the women's category - should get a free pass is a nonsense argument.
 

monkers

Squire
What happens in the rare cases when an initial doping test is inconclusive or disputed?

You re test and move to next level testing.

Pretending it's too hard to test the sex of the competitors and therefore the athletes whose sex is disputed - which is invariably males in the women's category - should get a free pass is a nonsense argument.

That means retesting everybody a second time.
 

monkers

Squire
No it means further testing if the result is ambiguous or disputed.

Deeper analysis will reveal the truth.

You can't help wonder why the Algerian boxer didn't want his results released or be tested further 🤔

There is clear evidence here, but not what you think it is.
 

monkers

Squire
They didn't re test everybody when Lance Armstrong failed a doping test.

What has that got to do with it?

Back to topic, if your testing regime does not catch the people you intend, what do you do, just retest that ones that Trump, Musk or Rowling demand are retested.

What will you say if Khalief takes one test and the result is that she has no Y chromosome? Will you be satisfied?
 
You retest any athlete that disputes the initial swab result. You claim they would need to retest every athlete. Why would they?

In view of the controversy and the evasive behaviour of the Khelife camp I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for a thorough investigation in this case.
 
Last edited:

CXRAndy

Guru
What has that got to do with it?

Back to topic, if your testing regime does not catch the people you intend, what do you do, just retest that ones that Trump, Musk or Rowling demand are retested.

What will you say if Khalief takes one test and the result is that she has no Y chromosome? Will you be satisfied?

Why wouldn't a test designed to ascertain sex not work
 

spen666

Senior Member
Try challenging the facts instead of manufacturing slights against posters. It's always the same with you, whenever the facts don't suit you seek to belittle the poster.

Did Vera Baird say those words? What message do they convey? That is all that is being asked.

Try challenging facts says the person who lies that the Supreme Court did not carry out it's task.


Since the decision of the Supreme Court it has been clarified what the meaning of the definition of a women is. You may not agree with their decision, but it is undisputable that they have clarified the meaning



As for belittling posters, who was it that called those who disagreed with your views "shiteheads"


You can try squirming and spinning all you like, but your position on the Supreme Court decision is untenable.


Whether you agree with the decision or not the Supreme Court have clarified what the meaning of the legislation is.

You seem unable to comprehend that the Supreme Court have clarified the meaning. This is the case whether you agree with the determination or not. The Supreme Court have made the clarification


Try understanding that there is a difference between clarification and you agreeing with the decision
 
Last edited:

monkers

Squire
Try challenging facts says the person who lies that the Supreme Court did not carry out it's task.


Since the decision of the Supreme Court it has been clarified what the meaning of the definition of a women is. You may not agree with their decision, but it is undisputable that they have clarified the meaning



As for belittling posters, who was it that called those who disagreed with your views "shiteheads"


You can try squirming and spinning all you like, but your position on the Supreme Court decision is untenable.


Whether you agree with the decision or not the Supreme Court have clarified what the meaning of the legislation is.

You seem unable to comprehend that the Supreme Court have clarified the meaning. This is the case whether you agree with the determination or not. The Supreme Court have made the clarification


Try understanding that there is a difference between clarification and you agreeing with the decision

It's laughable that you think that the SC has the lawful competence to change the law despite what the then government and parliament intended.
 

CXRAndy

Guru
Its not like minkers to be short on words.

I think they know the game (pun) is up for males playing in women's sports.

The same for accessing women's facilities.

As for the most shocking aspect, the mutilation of children, this too thankfully has been stopped.

In the future people will wonder what the hell went on in the early 21st century
 

monkers

Squire
Its not like minkers to be short on words.

I think they know the game (pun) is up for males playing in women's sports.

The same for accessing women's facilities.

As for the most shocking aspect, the mutilation of children, this too thankfully has been stopped.

In the future people will wonder what the hell went on in the early 21st century

Arguing with determined bigots always proves to be futile especially when they moronic trolls.
 
Top Bottom