I love how Classic insists Barbie Khardashian is a woman just like any other woman and then forgets and calls them 'him'.
While ironically after calling all trans women 'males', you've called her 'them' which is a pronoun that you've previously refused to use.
You love a nice cheap point, don't you Rora.
... there is more to 'pattern' than raw crime numbers. The pattern would be if they are committing the same quantity of the same crimes.
This is important because you pivot straight from this somewhat useless piece of data to talking about crimes of violence or sexual assault against women hoping to make the association that trans women offer the same risk to cis women as cis men.
Could be shoplifting for all we know.
Why would transwomen not offend at the same rate as other men, especially given that to be a transwoman you don't have to be taking hrt or have had surgery?
Why would saying 'I'm a woman' magically overcome the effects of either testosterone or male socialisation?
Why would transwomen not offend at the same rate as other men, especially given that to be a transwoman you don't have to be taking hrt or have had surgery?
You spend half your life on here claiming I'm inconsistent but don't like it being pointed out in others. Seems odd.
The 'violent crime' was defined as follows:So we still don't know the nature of the violent crime. Could be pub fights for all you know.
It includes sex crimes, so yes transwomen are the same risk to females in terms of committing a sex crime as any other man.Given that you are citing this as evidence of risk to women you'd still have to show that the crimes represent a risk to women.
And that is the problem with this. You are trying to use this study for something for which it was not intended.
And you don't seem to understand what a confounder is.
I don't forget that he was a boy, when the gender recognition certificate was applied for, by someone else. I use she for after the gender recognition certificate was given.I love how Classic insists Barbie Khardashian is a woman just like any other woman and then forgets and calls them 'him'.
The 'violent crime' was defined as follows:
View attachment 3868
It includes sex crimes, so yes transwomen are the same risk to females in terms of committing a sex crime as any other man.
It was intended to look at a range of long term data re transgender people. It included mortality, suicide rates, and yes, criminality rates. It's data based. It's not opinion.
Oh please, just try a bit of rational thinking. Do I really have to explain why this is hogwash? If no trans women took hormones you'd be on the beginnings of some kind of argument, but that they nearly do means that this just doesn't hold water, it's hogwash.
Male socialisation is what trans women are rejecting.
Actually no, because the authors are not offering a data based assertion on the risk to women from TW. You are, but it's opinion.
I don't forget that he was a boy, when the gender recognition certificate was applied for, by someone else. I use she for after the gender recognition certificate was given.
Please show where I've said she's just like any other woman.
The risk is the same as from any other man, which is to say higher than from women. If you don't think men are a risk to women in general, just say so. It would imply you don't think there is any need for any safeguarding or separation between the sexes at all, but it would be more honest than the gymnastics you are undertaking to try to show that transwomen are somehow different from other men.