Gender again. Sorry!

[AuroraSaab]

Aw shucks, you beat Aurora to it. She's usually the first to post stories about women sexually abusing children. Bet she's gutted.

Statistically women rarely sexually abuse children, as you know. The fact that Classic went back 18 months for that story tells you something. Greatly outnumbered by the number of male assailants, regardless of how they identify.

 

[monkers]

Statistically women rarely sexually abuse children, as you know. The fact that Classic went back 18 months for that story tells you something. Greatly outnumbered by the number of male assailants, regardless of how they identify.

You read the sarcasm warning and still decided to womansplain to everybody here what everybody here already appreciates. Applauds.

As noticed in the comment section of the article, people were noting that had that been a man behaving like that to two girls, they would have gone to a prison. You'd have been demanding life (probably) for a trans woman, such is your bias.

 

[AuroraSaab]

I doubt a man would. The prisons are full. They're mostly not even sending those found with huge amounts of child abuse imagery to jail at the moment.

I see ex Stonewall boss Ruth Hunt has started her reverse ferreting in her Times interview today.

Soon they'll all be scrambling to throw each under the bus or say they didn't know.

 

[monkers]

I doubt a man would. The prisons are full. They're mostly not even sending those found with huge amounts of child abuse imagery to jail at the moment.

Obviously due to them being overburdened with one and half million trans women rapists. (more sarcasm).

The problems are not all trans women, and not all men - the problems are mostly political failures. Are you expecting the government to admit that any time soon?

 

[Deleted member 159]

The problems are male behaviour, blaming political situation is misdirection

 

[icowden]

Your own approach has to be to demonise trans people as the worst kind of offenders mostly without evidence.

Whereas yours seems to be mostly to demonise Aurora for speaking up for women?

I'll say again, stating an opinion is not evidence of anything but prejudice.

They better stop those Scottish opinion polls then before they fall foul of the new hate law.

I have been advocating increases in resources to make things work, you have falsely accused trans people of all being violent, cheats, perverts, rapists and paedophiles whose only reason for transitioning is to be able to enter women's spaces and abuse them. You think this makes you the better person. I don't.

Except she hasn't done anything of the sort, but you persist in saying this. I'm pretty sure that what she has stated is that hidden amongst the trans community are undesirable elements that are taking advantage of it, and that to throw away all safeguards is foolish.

 

[multitool]

Whereas yours seems to be mostly to demonise Aurora for speaking up for women?

What on earth makes you think she's "speaking up for women"????

 

[monkers]

Whereas yours seems to be mostly to demonise Aurora for speaking up for women?

Three women in this household and she certainly doesn't speak for any of us. Aurora speaks for members of a cult including CXRAndy. Is she speaking for your views? Does that make you a woman?

 

[classic33]

Statistically women rarely sexually abuse children, as you know. The fact that Classic went back 18 months for that story tells you something. Greatly outnumbered by the number of male assailants, regardless of how they identify.

I didn't go back 18 months to get that piece. Searching on a library computer for parts/part numbers for a washing machine, it came up in the results.
Work that one out.

I will point out that when you've had a similar more recent, case presented to you, you've dismissed it in a similar fashion. Purely and simply because the perpetrator was female, or the victim of the female, was a male minor.

Whatever happened to the safety of the child. One case like the one linked to is one case too many.

 

[icowden]

What on earth makes you think she's "speaking up for women"????

She is one and the vast majority of her posts are about women's safety, fairness to women in sport etc.
Stop being deliberately obtuse.

 

[icowden]

Three women in this household and she certainly doesn't speak for any of us. Aurora speaks for members of a cult

Prove it. Name the cult leader.

You do know that it is possible to speak up for women's rights and not have all women agree with you? Many women disagreed with the suffragettes.

 

[classic33]

She is one and the vast majority of her posts are about women's safety, fairness to women in sport etc.
Stop being deliberately obtuse.

She's speaking for herself. Even she has said she doesn't/can't speak for all women.

 

[classic33]

Prove it. Name the cult leader.

You do know that it is possible to speak up for women's rights and not have all women agree with you? Many women disagreed with the suffragettes.

Suffragette or Suffragist?

The first was a listed terrorist organization, one that is credited with the invention of the letter bomb.
And they didn't care where they went off.

 

[AuroraSaab]

I will point out that when you've had a similar more recent, case presented to you, you've dismissed it in a similar fashion. Purely and simply because the perpetrator was female, or the victim of the female, was a male minor.

I haven't dismissed them. I've repeatedly said that women are statistically much less of a risk to other women and children than men are - and how the men identify is irrelevant.

Men comit around 98% of UK sex crimes. That's how big the difference is.

Whatever happened to the safety of the child. One case like the one linked to is one case too many.

It certainly is. Bearing in mind that men comit 98% of sex crimes, and that most victims are female, are there any very obvious steps we might take to keep girls and women safe? Men could just stop it with the sex offending, but until then what do you suggest?

 

[monkers]

Prove it. Name the cult leader.

Oh it's a job share.