Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

monkers

Shaman
View attachment 10517
You, this morning, talking about yourself as the author of a post made a couple of years ago by 'Monkers' - who you claim died in June. Just give it up. You think the people on this forum are mugs and your ridiculous posts pretending to be someone else are an insult to our intelligence.

There was a post made by me N. You were aware that it was I making the post because somebody, quite possibly you, said that I, the lawyer, was making a veiled threat. There has also been talk at some point about monkers being here ''lawyered up''.

In actual fact I was being sardonic, but the point was missed. The standard GC narrative includes stuff about the NHS, and to paraphrase, ''the NHS is infected by the woke mind virus''. As IanC had confided that he does some contract work for the NHS - (do I have that correct Ian?) - that he should be careful about what his employer (the NHS) might hear him say.

As is usual, you look to make mischief with words and posts made my others when they seem contrary to your own ''protected philosophical beliefs''.

You have a long history in this place of people complaining to you about misrepresenting their words, putting words in their mouth, overuse of hyperbole, making claims that can not be sustantiated, refusing to bring evidence to claims etc. monkers replies to you may have been sharp-tongued, they were nonetheless accurate in their characterisation of you and your obsessive beliefs and behaviours.
 

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
A tiny sample of the many times Monkers was being 'Sharp tongued' ....

Screenshot_20251015_153004_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20251015_152943_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20251015_152927_Chrome.jpg


You're an awful person lol. You'll have another spiral soon and the mask will drop again.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251015_152913_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20251015_152913_Chrome.jpg
    158.6 KB · Views: 0

icowden

Shaman
In actual fact I was being sardonic, but the point was missed. The standard GC narrative includes stuff about the NHS, and to paraphrase, ''the NHS is infected by the woke mind virus''. As IanC had confided that he does some contract work for the NHS - (do I have that correct Ian?) - that he should be careful about what his employer (the NHS) might hear him say.
Correct. And I riposted that the NHS was not my employer. I wasn't even contracted to work for the NHS at that time.
 

CXRAndy

Squire
Classic your sleuthing skills are questionable to say the least. You think I was on two forums I've never been on

:biggrin:
 
Last edited:

monkers

Shaman
A tiny sample of the many times Monkers was being 'Sharp tongued' ....

View attachment 10520

View attachment 10521

View attachment 10522

You're an awful person lol. You'll have another spiral soon and the mask will drop again.

She actually hated that word, and I never heard her speak it - but your lying did get under her skin.

But here we are oblivious to whatever the thread title is on any thread, because it is dominated by you and your obsessions.
 

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
Wasn't this yourself' accusing another person of being someone else?
Seems to be a habit of yours.
Yes it was. It's not that rare for people to quit forums and return under another name.

Pretty rare to die and let someone else keep posting under your name, in exactly the same style, complete with endless use of Copilot.

And for the record, I was one of many who questioned your varying posting styles when you appeared on CycleChat.
No idea what that means.
 

icowden

Shaman
Pretty rare to die and let someone else keep posting under your name, in exactly the same style, complete with endless use of Copilot.
Small detail - N doesn't post in the same style as Monkers. That's one of the many pointers that suggests she is genuine. Monkers was elderly and for her last year of posting also unwell I believe. Her postings tended to go up and down and be emotive and occasionally attacking.

N's posts tend to be the structured arguments you might expect from one trained in law, and I have never seen one that came across as emotive, nor have I seen any ad-hominems from N.
 
Top Bottom