Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

spen666

Über Member
They are different things. I haven't said otherwise, so we would have room for agreement there. The problem you have is that when I did say ''peaceful protesters'', I meant peaceful protesters - that should have been a big clue before you started posting with outrage about cases other than peaceful protesters.

You were clearly raising the issue of the Filton prisoners, because their trial was in the moment and widely reported, with them being the only remand prisoners on trial for the charges you listed.

You messed up spen. You could have just admitted the error and quickly moved on, but you took to doubling down and trolling instead.

And the record clearly shows it. So it's time to stop.

Once again you are talking bullsh*t and making things up.
You change your position with almost every post.

I never mentioned the Pilton mob as I had no idea about that I asked you whether burglary, criminal damage assaults are part of peaceful protesting
 

CXRAndy

Epic Member
The fact that you are so obsessed with me you go trawling 7 year old posts

Classic did they same with me. He found a site I made around 50 technical questions about ebikes /hubs

What was the site classic?

This was proof I was banned from Bike Radar. :laugh:
 

monkers

Shaman
Once again you are talking bullsh*t and making things up.
You change your position with almost every post.

I never mentioned the Pilton mob as I had no idea about that I asked you whether burglary, criminal damage assaults are part of peaceful protesting

I can understand that maybe, somehow, the term Filton (rather than Pilton - it's a place in the Bristol area) slipped by you. However your own posting history shows that you knew that a proscribed group was alleged to have committed that very specific range of offences that you listed, and that they were held on remand.

I find it impossible that you could have had that level of detail while not having heard of Palestine Action as you claim. You'd have to have been living under a rock as an ordinary citizen let alone a solicitor working with the Met Police not to have known that.

Best thing for you is to admit that you were trolling, and move on.
 
Last edited:

classic33

Missen
Classic did they same with me. He found a site I made around 50 technical questions about ebikes /hubs

What was the site classic?

This was proof I was banned from Bike Radar. :laugh:
I never said it was proof of anything other than you having an account on the site in question.
Bike Radar, from which you were banned vanished nearly a year ago.
This after you said, more than once on here that you never had an account on either site. That bike radar had you marked as banned wasn't a secret, they put Banned alongside your name.

You might remember you also admitted to opening no accounts on either of these sites. They were, in your own words "opened for you". Something that isn't allowed, as it's against site rules on CycleChat.

Me, I'm still on the site you "were never on".
 

spen666

Über Member
I can understand that maybe, somehow, the term Filton (rather than Pilton - it's a place in the Bristol area) slipped by you. However your own posting history shows that you knew that a proscribed group was alleged to have committed that very specific range of offences that you listed.

I find it impossible that you could have had that level of detail while not having heard of Palestine Action as you claim. You'd have to have been living under a rock as an ordinary citizen let alone a solicitor working with the Met Police not to have known that.

Best thing for you is to admit that you were trolling, and move on.

Trolling?

bit like you posting 7 year old posts on a football site about me

bit like you still contradicting yourself about the fact I have never mentioned Pilton/ Filton or any protests


however I did ask you the question as to where committing damage or burglary or assaults are peaceful protests and strangely you are silent and have been for a long time
 

monkers

Shaman
Trolling?

bit like you posting 7 year old posts on a football site about me

bit like you still contradicting yourself about the fact I have never mentioned Pilton/ Filton or any protests


however I did ask you the question as to where committing damage or burglary or assaults are peaceful protests and strangely you are silent and have been for a long time

It was always a case of you trying to stuff unsaid words into my mouth. Look, we are both lawyers here.

I never said or suggested that burglary, criminal damage, or assault are peaceful protest. The record shows that. It's time to stop pretending that I did.

When you raised the distinct and separate issue of remand prisoners charged with burglary, criminal damage, and assault, I knew that you were referencing the Filton prisoners. And you know that I know that. Not once did I state or suggest that this group were peaceful protesters. I did say that the jury could find 'lawful excuse' as they are entitled to find with their collective conscience. You seemed to say that you found this ''hilarious'' and that seemed to think I didn't know what I was talking about. Then it happened didn't it. The jury released them on the grounds of lawful excuse. Before that happened I tried to gently nudge you with the Colston statue example, but you were having none of it.

What you've experienced are the effects of someone who has just had enough of your childlike mind games. Move on.
 

spen666

Über Member
It was always a case of you trying to stuff unsaid words into my mouth.

Say the person trying to claim I was talking about the Pilton/ Filton mob when I never mentioned them, had no knowledge of their case etc

It seems you are doing what you are falsely accusing me of
You keep trying to claim I was talking about something I wasn't and in doing so trying to put words into my mouth
 

classic33

Missen
Classic is still upset because he thinks this man should be in a women's prison and I don't.
He thinks me sarcastically suggesting he go visit him in Limerick jail is nastier than Monkers calling me and others a c#nt or a d#ckhead many times over. His tone policing only applies to me apparently.

He's out now, Classic, and free to go in Irish women's spaces like changing rooms. I'm sure he appreciates your support.


View attachment 13084
For someone who seems to think that the courts decision is the correct one, when it aligns with your views, you're showing just how much you care when they don't.

Like it or not the law of the land has been followed. And in this case, your fallback case when you try to prove something, is legally a women. And for that you have three other women to thank. They applied, and got the GRC for him. At a time when he was below the minimum age to apply himself.
Where's your mock indignation/outrage at what women did to a child? There's non there because that would destroy your narrative and demonisation of all trans gender people.

The fact that trans gender prisoners are in isolation, often solitary for 23 hours a day. For their safety, not as you keep insisting for the safety of other prisoners. You even cheered when a purpose built facility was removed from the womens facility to the mens. Even though the other two inmates in that facility at the time were women murderers.
Where's there anything said, by you about the woman child murderer mentioned in that headline. What of the children she murdered. Yet somehow you persist with your insistence that making threats against a person* that hasn't been seen since the age of ten is worse than taking multiple lives.
*"The state" couldn't even locate the same woman when required. They aren't even certain she's still on the island, much less in the country.

As for Barbie, that she is no longer in prison isn't news, she's at a known address in Limerick, County not City.

Care to explain why the number of trans men in Irish prisons outnumber trans women? And why trans men with GRC's still outnumber trans women in Ireland?
 

classic33

Missen
Say the person trying to claim I was talking about the Pilton/ Filton mob when I never mentioned them, had no knowledge of their case etc

It seems you are doing what you are falsely accusing me of
You keep trying to claim I was talking about something I wasn't and in doing so trying to put words into my mouth
You could easily clear this up by stating who it was you were actually talking about
After all specific offences were mentioned by you. Maybe explain who else it could have been, for the avoidance of doubt.
 

spen666

Über Member
You could easily clear this up by stating who it was you were actually talking about
After all specific offences were mentioned by you. Maybe explain else it could have been, for the avoidance of doubt.

I was not talking about anyone I was trying to identify what Monkers regarded as peaceful protests. I used 3 categories of offences, Damage, Burglary and Assault as examples
 

monkers

Shaman
Say the person trying to claim I was talking about the Pilton/ Filton mob when I never mentioned them, had no knowledge of their case etc

It seems you are doing what you are falsely accusing me of
You keep trying to claim I was talking about something I wasn't and in doing so trying to put words into my mouth

Do I have to take the trouble now to repost what is already on the record?

You are already in ludicrous mode. Where to next?
 

classic33

Missen
I was not talking about anyone I was trying to identify what Monkers regarded as peaceful protests. I used 3 categories of offences, Damage, Burglary and Assault as examples
And you also mentioned that people were on remand for just such offences. It'd be impossible to mention one without knowing of the other, given that you called them peaceful protest methods.
 
Top Bottom