The US has indeed tried to acquire Greenland in the past, but IIRC not since the founding of NATO, and not by threatening its supposed allies either militarily or financially.
Surely even you can see the difference and the damage Trumps words (and any subsequent actions) have).
It's odd, assuming the user with the same name on the mothership is you, you don't seem totally unreasonable on there, so why the utter delusion here?
He thinks it's funny. Pretty much admitted it from day one on here

Random late night thinking. Why is taking Greenland so important to the US?
If the US controls Greenland then Canada is surrounded and supply lines cut. Eeyore.
Many commentators saying it's an ego issue for Trump. He wants to be the President that added the largest land area to the US.Random late night thinking. Why is taking Greenland so important to the US?
If the US controls Greenland then Canada is surrounded and supply lines cut. Eeyore.
Many commentators saying it's an ego issue for Trump. He wants to be the President that added the largest land area to the US.
(Everybody here and everywhere pointed out that they already have treaties allowing them pretty much everything from a military/security perspective, that Denmark/Greenland are already talking to mining companies about mineral extraction, etc.)
I think this is the coolest animation of why the Mercator projection is so misleading... basically Mexico (red) and Greenland (erm, green) are about the same size (swapped here in the screenshot)
https://bsky.app/profile/helenkennedy.bsky.social/post/3mcpv7dvaz22a
View attachment 12392

The damage done by Germany was irreparable while Hitler remained Chancellor.
Same goes while Trump remains President.
So the damage done by Germany was repairable.
Once they suffered a humiliating defeat at the cost of many millions of lives.
That's not in dispute.
The point is the damage was not irreparable and has been repaired
Too many hyperbolic claims that do not stand up to the most basic of scrutiny