Inheritance Tax

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

PK99

Regular
Semantics, schemantics. The tax is not payable during life and the recipients ultimately retain the value of the inheritance less tax. If they can’t afford to pay by other means they will usually sell the property and remit to HMRC within six months. That feels like the recipients paying the tax to me. Either way, the concept of a tax on unearned income still seems reasonable.

It is far from semantics. The inheritors receive nothing until the inheritance tax is paid. The amount of tax is wholly dependant on the financial position of the deceased and in no way upon the financial position of the inheritor.
 
It is far from semantics. The inheritors receive nothing until the inheritance tax is paid. The amount of tax is wholly dependant on the financial position of the deceased and in no way upon the financial position of the inheritor.

Two sides of the same coin.

What’s your view on abolishing, reforming or retaining an inheritance tax?
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Two sides of the same coin.

What’s your view on abolishing, reforming or retaining an inheritance tax?

I suspect the views on inheritance tax will vary based upon either the amount the individual potentially has to leave to their beneficiaries or the amount potential beneficiaries anticipate being left.

If people feel strongly about it it is possible for beneficiaries to sign a legal deed of variation if they think the amount they have been left is too much or even donate it to a charity of their choice.
 
OP
OP
icowden

icowden

Squire
It is far from semantics. The inheritors receive nothing until the inheritance tax is paid.
The issue that I have is where the inheritors are rendered homeless due to the inheritance tax. This happened to my aunties. My uncle died leaving everything to his wife. She died within 3 weeks of his death (many say of a broken heart). This meant that his property (which was large) instead of being inherited by his daughters had to be sold to pay the inheritance tax, and they had to find temporary lodging before they could buy somewhere with the inheritance. They lost the house that they grew up in.
 

Ian H

Legendary Member
The issue that I have is where the inheritors are rendered homeless due to the inheritance tax. This happened to my aunties. My uncle died leaving everything to his wife. She died within 3 weeks of his death (many say of a broken heart). This meant that his property (which was large) instead of being inherited by his daughters had to be sold to pay the inheritance tax, and they had to find temporary lodging before they could buy somewhere with the inheritance. They lost the house that they grew up in.

Whilst it's obviously tragic that they had to move from their ancestral home, your account doesn't fit most definitions of homelessness.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
The issue that I have is where the inheritors are rendered homeless due to the inheritance tax. This happened to my aunties. My uncle died leaving everything to his wife. She died within 3 weeks of his death (many say of a broken heart). This meant that his property (which was large) instead of being inherited by his daughters had to be sold to pay the inheritance tax, and they had to find temporary lodging before they could buy somewhere with the inheritance. They lost the house that they grew up in.

Isn't this the mechanism via which National Trust "acquired" many of it's properties?
 

slowmotion

Active Member
HMRC gets a total of about £530 billion a year from all taxes. Inheritance Tax contributes about £6.5 billion a year. It's not a very large percentage. Of course some will say that it's not enough, and others that it wouldn't be a big deal if it didn't exist. Take your choice.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
ok so it was introuduced in 1796 to try and protect the poor and to stem the continued wealth of the rich, a bit.

You can now leave £325,000 tax free. Anything over this will be taxed at a rate of 40%, or 36% if you donate at least 10% to charity.

The only way around it I guess is to give away your wealth and then survive at least 7 years.

Given the constant cries of "the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer", it would appear, that after 200+ years, it is not working?
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Yes, but you didn’t earn the massively increased value of your house (and neither did I). You may have improved and cared for it, but mostly you just lived in it and the bulk of your inflation in value happened without you lifting a finger.

It rather depends on your view regarding the word "earn".

Does one have to do manual labour to "earn", or, does "thinking", "delegating", "planning" and other "white collar" activities qualify a person as having "earned"?

Is it possible to be a (say) professional gambler, or, investor, and still be said to have "earned" one's money?
 
Last edited:

theclaud

Reading around the chip
It rather depends on your view regarding the word "earn".

Does one have to do manual labour to "earn", or, does "thinking", "delegating", "planning" and other "white collar" activities qualify a person as having "earned"?

Is it possible to be a (say) professional gambler, or, investor, and still be said to have "earned" one's money?

LOL
 
OP
OP
icowden

icowden

Squire
Unfortunately he misses one basic thing.
If I have done a piece of work and been paid £100, I pay my tax and take home £80.

If I then choose to buy £10 of petrol or a £50 luxury item which includes VAT, any taxes are on that transaction and included in the price.
It's my choice to spend money on something of which part of the price includes a payment to the Government.

Inheritance Tax is not paid out of choice, it is mandated by the Government and represents taking money which was already taxed. Yes, there is capital gain in the form of house price rises which has not been taxed, but that is largely the fault of the Government who run a system in which one of the best investments for money is buying a house.
 
Top Bottom