CXRAndy
Legendary Member
Its nothing to do with supporting or helping those in Palestine
Its all virtue signalling from those in the west. They don't do much more than wearing a tea towel and shouting slogans
Its nothing to do with supporting or helping those in Palestine
Its all virtue signalling from those in the west. They don't do much more than wearing a tea towel and shouting slogans
So often Israel is using "proof" yet so often that "proof" is kept secret and even when published found to be completely lacking. I have no idea about this current "proof" but from past claims people just no longer believe Israel.Israel claim they have proof that one of them was a member of Hamas.
I agree.Feels a bit unfair on the Met to blame them for carry out instructions from the Home Secretary. I doubt they particularly wanted to waste time, money and manpower on this sort of thing. The protestors also deliberately turned up with signs having specifically been told that doing so would lead to their arrest so presumably wanted this to happen to make their point. The Government are making themselves look stupid with their stance, I think some of the protestors are also a bit naive in the potential impact even a 'slap on the wrist' punishment can cause.
What are they supposed to do? The Met are far better resourced than any other force in the UK but when they are pushed into the spotlight like this by a ridiculous Government policy they don't really have a choice but to be seen to uphold the law (no matter how stupid people think it is) and the sheer scale means they need extra resources. It's pretty standard practice, when the NATO summit was held near where I live we had officers from every force in the country based in the area.
I suppose also there is : what were the Police not able to do because resource was being used to arrest 80 year old people holing bits of cardboard? One report on the radio was an officer saying how they had to take resource from criminal investigations so reasonable to ask that given they are resource limited are they prioritising more serious crimes.Priorities: was there a threat to life and limb? Danger of riot and looting? Foreign dignitaries needing security?
Police main function is to prevent / stop a breach of the peace
If they believe the law is wrong, then the appropriate course of action is to campaign to change the law. It is not appropriate to deliberately break the laws you do not agree with. That is anarchy
But we all want to know what your position is on plasticine.
But we all want to know what your position is on plasticine.
Peaceful demonstration is one of the methods that, in a free society, can be used as part of the campaign to change the law. I suspect other, less controversial, methods are also being used, but make fewer headlines and can more easily be ignored/stymied by governments.
I believe in this case the law is being misused by the Labour government for political purposes. There was violence towards property in the air base break-in, but I believe it was obvious it would be discovered and do not believe it was designed to endanger lives, and could have been treated effectively by the use of existing laws.
Peaceful demonstration is not deliberately committing crimes
Priorities: was there a threat to life and limb? Danger of riot and looting? Foreign dignitaries needing security?
Peaceful demonstration is not deliberately committing crimes