Israel / Palestine

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

farfromtheland

Regular AND Goofy
It is exactly what this is.

How is he pontificating?

By making a public judgement not to support his mate and his roots.
With consequences. Fandom works both ways.

And if the shows were cancelled, fans would get a ticket refund. Now they're stuck with an iffy show.
 
Last edited:

Psamathe

Legendary Member
I don't think he had much choice but to remove Macklemore. Touring and setting up large gigs employs hundreds of people. You can't just quickly move it to another venue. It would be nuts to sack them and disappoint thousands of people to accomodate one person, regardless of whether you think he has a right to use his support spot for politics or not.
Also I suspect headlining artist has more power than they think eg. Ed Sheeran tells those who sacked Macklemore "He had an important message so when I go on stage I'll be saying the same and it will get a lot more public attention when I say the same. I'm not walking out so over to promoter to make decisions".
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Also I suspect headlining artist has more power than they think eg. Ed Sheeran tells those who sacked Macklemore "He had an important message so when I go on stage I'll be saying the same and it will get a lot more public attention when I say the same. I'm not walking out so over to promoter to make decisions".

I've seen the comment elsewhere that the decision 'not to be political' in itself can be/is political. I think Sheeran is finding that out now, backed into a corner by a promoter who chose to raise the stakes by making demands. Sheeran made his choice, which is political whether he likes it or not.
 

farfromtheland

Regular AND Goofy
Also I suspect headlining artist has more power than they think eg. Ed Sheeran tells those who sacked Macklemore "He had an important message so when I go on stage I'll be saying the same and it will get a lot more public attention when I say the same. I'm not walking out so over to promoter to make decisions".

That would do.
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
He also makes it explicitly clear absolutely distinguishing between Israel and Jewish:
"... to all of my Jewish brothers & sisters, criticism of Israel, criticism of aparthied, being against genocide in no way is a criticism of you. My message is for peace ..."


Edit: fans seem to respond to the comments positively.
 
Last edited:

Rusty Nails

Country Member
I've seen the comment elsewhere that the decision 'not to be political' in itself can be/is political. I think Sheeran is finding that out now, backed into a corner by a promoter who chose to raise the stakes by making demands. Sheeran made his choice, which is political whether he likes it or not.

I would prefer the word apolitical, otherwise we are getting into "if you're not for me you're against me" territory.
 
Top Bottom