Pinno718
Squire
It'll be amusing to hear outrage from Reform about No10 putting pressure on civil servants when it's their policy to sack civil servants and replace them with people who'll do what No10 tell them
You never watched 'Yes minister'?
It'll be amusing to hear outrage from Reform about No10 putting pressure on civil servants when it's their policy to sack civil servants and replace them with people who'll do what No10 tell them
Does it not also consider where individuals might have other influences (eg personal interests like their companies) and to put in place mitigations to protect against those personal interests influencing their Government role.
Does it not also consider where individuals might have other influences (eg personal interests like their companies) and to put in place mitigations to protect against those personal interests influencing their Government role.
My understanding Ifrom reliable reports) is that the concerns are in relation to Madlelson's companies and contacts with some foreign Governments (eg China and Russia). Thus Robbins put mitigations in place to protect against those concerns and thus allow the appointment to proceed.
Everything after this is suppositionUp to a point. It confirms that Robbins didn't inform him
You never watched 'Yes minister'?
Everything after this is supposition
This is obviously untrue
1. Starmer benefits if he stays on as do his cabinet members
2. Those who want to be next labour leader and or next PM benefit if he goes
You may come up with other examples, but some will benefit if he stays and some will benefit if he goes
Does Britain benefit?
Seems very unfair to lose a career because of the failings of others you [Robbins] has no control over.Poor Ollie has been sacked. Has anyone given a thought to how or where he is going to get another job? Poor chap may have a mortgage to pay.
Seems very unfair to lose a career because of the failings of others you [Robbins] has no control over.
Happening to too many who work for Starmer; says something (not good) about Starmer.