deptfordmarmoset
Über Member
I think that's more prickle than prick.
I think that's more prickle than prick.
It really doesn't though, if by that you mean intent to offend, or some malicious purpose. This tendency to ascribe racism to the character of individuals is not helpful - racist imagery/language/ideas/assumptions are present and available in our culture. It is very easy to use or buy into them unthinkingly, or just by not thinking carefully enough, as well as by intending to hurt or to denigrate. It's well known that Baddiel did a blackface routine ages ago depicting Jason Lee. It was meant by Baddiel to be good-humoured mockery, but he recognises that it was crass and racist and has apologised for doing it (although not to Lee directly, by all accounts). It doesn't make Baddiel a bad person or make it necessary to write him off as a racist for ever, but it is important to recognise what's wrong with white people casually blacking up for laughs and to acknowledge that ordinary well-meaning people can be complicit in racism, however benign they imagine their intent.We seem to have lost the nuance that racism requires intent, whether passive or active and that without intent, there is no racism.
Do you imagine that you'd know someone's intent better than they do?however benign they imagine their intent.
TheClaud has already picked up on this, but it's so important that I'm going to be boringly repetitive....
We seem to have lost the nuance that racism requires intent, whether passive or active and that without intent, there is no racism.
...
TheClaud has already picked up on this, but it's so important that I'm going to be boringly repetitive.
I am a white male living (and brought up) in middle-class UK. Therefore, I have absorbed whole swathes of assumptions, associations, prejudices, etc, many of which are racist or sexist. I think it's reasonably safe to say that I do not go about my life intending either racism or sexism, in fact I try moderately hard to eliminate both of them. But every day, in a hundred (hopefully mainly minor) ways, I react to situations in ways that contain racism or sexism. It is racism when I respond to a person from global majority heritage differently to a white anglo-saxon, whether I intended it or not, and their experience is largely independent of my intent.
Why is there no 4th option in your list?And third time lucky...
It's perfectly possible to be accidently unintentionally racist sexist transphobic etc etc.
But it is still those things, unintended, or not
Most of us carry around unconscious, unexamined biases that we've picked up from our passage through our life.
If these genuine oversights get picked up and pointed out we have a few choices .
Have a little think , realise our mistake and go "ooops yeah I see what you mean, I get it now"
"Could do better."
Run away, stick our fingers in our ears , and go "tra la la , I can't (won't) hear you.. "
Or go complete double-down thick and meaty full froth gammonfest.
"IT's all juSt pC gaWn mAd'
and angrily resist any possibility of adjustment or rethink..
The choice is ours..
Isn't it nice to have these choices..
Why is there no 4th option in your list?
No frothing or Gammon type activity but the simple 'eyes to the sky, get a grip ' dismissive approach, that's what I do.
Not at all, not listening and putting fingers in ears is very different to listening, hearing, deciding it's ridiculous and then dismissing it as an opportunity to pull the racist card.That's pretty much the second option isn't it.
Ignoring, refusing to listen, or even countenance the possibility of new learning.
I probs shouldn't waste pity on people who are like this, but it must be a pretty samey and dull way to experience the world, and the people in it..
Agreed.It's perfectly possible to be accidently unintentionally racist sexist transphobic etc etc.
But it is still those things, unintended, or not
Most of us carry around unconscious, unexamined biases that we've picked up from our passage through our life.
Nah. It's not that simple. There are other options. I'll give you the excuse of limited time to explain a complex situation. :-xIf these genuine oversights get picked up and pointed out we have a few choices .
Have a little think , realise our mistake and go "ooops yeah I see what you mean, I get it now"
"Could do better."
Run away, stick our fingers in our ears , and go "tra la la , I can't (won't) hear you.. "
Or go complete double-down thick and meaty full froth gammonfest. "IT's all juSt pC gaWn mAd'
and angrily resist any possibility of adjustment or rethink..
I think that's a bad reading of Baddiel's character. May I ask what this form of McCarthyism is? It's a term from ... well, before I was born, so I'm not sure how it relates to Baddiel's era.I think Baddiel is basically a decent sort, and he has certainly been on the receiving end of antisemitic abuse, but he bought into a form of McCarthyism and allied himself with some seriously bad faith actors. He seems convinced that everything is about him, and has become extremely boring as a result. I'm not inclined to give his book a go on the basis of the rest of his recent output.
Agreed.
Nah. It's not that simple. There are other options. I'll give you the excuse of limited time to explain a complex situation. :-x
But I'd like to point out that when someone disagrees with your accusation of racism, it is possible they don't fully fit your "thick and meaty full froth gammon" stereotype.
No, you were replying to Swansonj: Shep's post(s) came later. If you keep dragging sexism into a (reasonably nuanced) debate about unintentional racism, this might be a struggle.Well of course I could have gone through many other options, where all sorts of possibilities were gone through .
But I was replying to Shep who has amply displayed how uninterested he is in these matters.
And furthermore, how little interest he has in the views of women, in general.