My original point was that, although he is now being vilified as a "paedophile", the behaviour of lusting after 17 year old females is still one that is largely supported by considerable sections of society, including many of those doing the vilifying.
Well 17 years old typically are in the period of their life where showing off is a large part of their life. There is a whole difference between acknowledging a 17 years old looks nice and going to bed with said person.
IMO, the major issue is not her age (the age difference is an issue for me but that's just my old-fashioned morals speaking) - the issue is coercion and exploitation.
Yeah but the lines between those are very very thin, but agreed it all comes down to that, if it is a 17year old with an 50 year old without any coercion and exploitation it would be fine. Although the person would still be a peado in the public eye, legally there would be nothing wrong.
Wasn't someone on telly using the 'he's not a paedophile, he's an ephebophile' defence in relation to Epstein a while back? Personally I think the term 'paedophile' is overused and frequently unhelpful. It's an appeal to emotion.
Without an mental research we will never know, and considering he's death that will never happen. Maybe the little kiddo's was just because there easily manipulated and it's off course a better leverage against a famous person than just having had sex with someone who is legal. We must not forget Epstein was about controlling having leverage over person above all. That's what has kept him in his position for so long.
Edited to add, i agree the term Paedophile is used to much, changing it to ephebophile isn't going to change much either, they just need to stop using it as an strawman argument for example when they say the police needs more powers terrorism and pedophiles are always ,mentioned as reasons why, however there is no evidence of one of those offenses being more effectively dealt with since getting more powers.