PaulB
Active Member
This is just rubbish.
Andrew was granted the title in 1986.
Yes I know. I wanted your invaluable input.
This is just rubbish.
Andrew was granted the title in 1986.
No shes not a child at 17…..legally she can have sex at 16 and therefore children, so no hes not a nonce “if” she was 17 at the time of the so called sexual event
I don't understand who is doing the coercing, the trafficker or the person having paid or unpaid sex with the trafficked party when they might not know about the trafficking.He maybe can't but I can. It's about coercion. If the sex is consensual there isn't an issue. As soon as there is an element of coercion with the 16/17 age bracket, statutory offences are committed. So if she was trafficked that would count as coercion, and thus an offence occurred.
I don't understand
Have you considered simply thinking a little harder?
That's not very helpful, is it?
I've done quite a bit of helpful on this subject for you over the years. Are you ever going to have a go on your own, without the stabilisers?
Have you considered trying being less gnomic?
It's arguable in court. A good defence Barrister will of course try to argue that their client was not aware that the girl had been trafficked or was being coerced into a sexual relationship. Whether the Jury will buy that a 41 year old prince had no idea that the 17 year old he was alleged to have had a relationship with was being coerced / trafficked by his friends is another matter...I don't understand who is doing the coercing, the trafficker or the person having paid or unpaid sex with the trafficked party when they might not know about the trafficking.
Humour?Who the f**k is 'tallbrowngent' and what does he add to society?
Humour?
Humour?