briantrumpet
Squire
Surely it's time to change the thread title...
Andrew Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
Maybe Matt Goodwin is right about foreigners.
Surely it's time to change the thread title...
Andrew Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
Parents of certain generations were wont to say that. It's a basic Conservative principle.
Also, for not very smart people who can't appreciate complexities it allows them to rate themselves using a single number (net worth) so comparing against others make "my number is bigger than yours".
Completely fails to appreciate that life is about what you achieve and that somebody on struggling on minimum wage can achieve a lot more than somebody who inherits vast wealth ...
I see them as the same. "Achieve" is about doing the best you can in your situation. Thus many mega-wealthy achieve very little (when you have multiple $ billions, putting a $ few thousand to some else's startup idea is no "achievement"). Whereas on minimum pay zero hours contract working 3 jobs, building up a local kids football team is a real achievement that person should be proud of.I'm not even sure that's wholly true. For some people it's enough just to survive the shitty hand they've been dealt (though I suppose for them that might be an achievement). As my mother said frequently, "Life's not fair".
I see them as the same. "Achieve" is about doing the best you can in your situation. Thus many mega-wealthy achieve very little (when you have multiple $ billions, putting a $ few thousand to some else's startup idea is no "achievement"). Whereas on minimum pay zero hours contract working 3 jobs, building up a local kids football team is a real achievement that person should be proud of.
Or to bring it back to non-royalty, massive unearned wealth and then shooting a few innocent birds at a social "shooting weekend" is no "achievement".
What do you mean truthful? That he can't sweat, likes pizza or never met her because you can see someone's used Photoshop? It's pretty obvious that he can, he might, and he did?Based on the latest batch of emails, is there any possibility he was being truthful about Virginia? Or were the emails a deliberate ruse?
For context, even Trump appears to have expressed misgivings (albeit he didn't do anything about them, like stop being their friend or report concerns to any authorities). But Andrew seems to have thought it was just a titillating jape.
In hindsight.No no no….
Andrew had a tendency to be “too honourable” to point out that that Epstein “has quite obviously conducted himself in a manner unbecoming”.
For context, even Trump appears to have expressed misgivings (albeit he didn't do anything about them, like stop being their friend or report concerns to any authorities). But Andrew seems to have thought it was just a titillating jape.
but I can also see how he would be the perfect person for her to pick if she never actually had sex with him
FTFYHe’s an abusive piece of shit, in my book.
Don’t forget that the terms of the agreement he reached with the victim, Ms Giuffre, include that Andrew can never deny that he raped her.
He’s an abusive piece of shoot, in my book.
Former prince Andrew accused of ‘hiding’ from US House’s Epstein inquiry
A congressperson investigating the Jeffrey Epstein case accused the former prince, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, of “hiding” from his committee’s request to sit for a deposition, as Congress moves closer to a key vote on forcing release of US government files related to the alleged sex trafficker.
Suhas Subramanyam is among the Democratic members of the oversight committee in the House of Representatives who earlier this month asked Mountbatten-Windsor to sit for a deposition as part of its investigation into how the government handled the case against Epstein ...