Prince Andrew

[secretsqirrel]

A couple of random thoughts today.
How different could things have been if Queenie had allowed Randy Andy to settle with Koo Stark?
If it goes to court could the prosecution demand/ask politely for the full unreacted Trump/Epstein files?

Don’t think Koo Stark, lovely though she is, would have made much difference, she is older than him.

 

[Pblakeney]

Don’t think Koo Stark, lovely though she is, would have made much difference, she is older than him.

Yeahbut, 40 years ago it was possibly a positive rather than a negative. 😉 It was a sliding doors moment.
We will never know but lives pivot on seemingly small decisions.

 

[Pblakeney]

I wonder... they might ask but they might not get.

Yeahbut, special relationship and all that.
No, they wouldn't get imo. It would highlight/confirm the conspiracy of silence across the pond though.

 

[First Aspect]

The information that the charges refer to would not be relevant to sex trafficng victims. It has come to light because of Epstein, but it's an investigation that is relevant only insofar as it was disclosed (allegedly). So I suspect they will be given access, with potentially other recipients redacted I suppose.

 

[BoldonLad]

Don’t think Koo Stark, lovely though she is, would have made much difference, she is older than him.

Only 3 years older, not a lot.

But, I agree, I doubt she would have had an impact on certain aspects of his character.

 

[Pross]

To be fair to Charles, I believe he has always had contempt for Andrew, but had to hold his tongue whilst the Queen was alive. He is just happy to cut Andrew adrift now and knows he won't be condemned for doing so.

Yeah, from my extensive research and knowledge (bits of The Crown I caught whilst in the room with the wife and daughter) Andy was the favourite and Charlie felt he wasn't given much love.

 

[Pblakeney]

The information that the charges refer to would not be relevant to sex trafficng victims. It has come to light because of Epstein, but it's an investigation that is relevant only insofar as it was disclosed (allegedly). So I suspect they will be given access, with potentially other recipients redacted I suppose.

I'm not so sure it would be so easy to hide as that. I mean, purely on financial exchanges alone I cannot be the only one that sees a potential connection of Andrew -> Epstein -> Trump. Financial misconduct needs at least two participants.

 

[First Aspect]

The alleged misconduct is the disclosure, unless AMW used it himself for financial advantage. I am not sure it matters what Epstein did with it.

 

[Pblakeney]

The alleged misconduct is the disclosure, unless AMW used it himself for financial advantage. I am not sure it matters what Epstein did with it.

But how does anyone know how far the misdeeds go without following the paper trail to it's conclusion.
Note that this is a mostly rhetorical/mind wandering question.

 

[stephec]

 

[First Aspect]

But how does anyone know how far the misdeeds go without following the paper trail to it's conclusion.
Note that this is a mostly rhetorical/mind wandering question.

In principle, the misdeed could be person in public office to member of the public, full stop. I suppose there could beore going on as well though. It's all speculation at this point.

 

[Ianonabike]

Yeah, from my extensive research and knowledge (bits of The Crown I caught whilst in the room with the wife and daughter) Andy was the favourite and Charlie felt he wasn't given much love.

I think I made it about halfway through Olivia Colman's reign.

 

[First Aspect]

The next series is going to be good though, isn't it?

 

[Ian H]

"The King of Troubles", a 'short story special' in Private Eye is a good guide, though obviously entirely fictional.

 

[briantrumpet]

"The King of Troubles", a 'short story special' in Private Eye is a good guide, though obviously entirely fictional.

Now you tell me!