midlandsgrimpeur
Active Member
I can honestly say, I have zero interest in or concern for his hardships or otherwise, but, I do care if a knee jerk decision ends up costing the public finances even more than now.
I agree. Sandringham is, I believe, privately owned by KC and not the Crown Estates so I assume this had been done so as not to have him living in a publically funded property. What other income he may receive, security etc. is another matter. Unfortunately I struggle to see a scenario where no public money at all is being spent on him, at least indirectly.
 
				 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		