AuroraSaab
Epic Member
The photos of them together often have interesting body language. She drapes herself over him, he is distant. A woman with father issues willing to do abhorrent things for his approval and the status he granted.
The photos of them together often have interesting body language. She drapes herself over him, he is distant. A woman with father issues willing to do abhorrent things for his approval and the status he granted.
But will that achieve anything beyond reminding the country about the allegations and reminding us all about his involvement with Epstein.Breaking news
Andrew has won the first round of his complaint
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr1exlvpzylvo
Breaking news
Andrew has won the first round of his complaint
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr1exlvpzylvo
It will be interesting to see how much, if any, of what they have looked at so far can be used as evidence of wrongdoing, if of course they find anything.
You would hope that in a high profile case like this the courts would have got the warrant right.
There can be no evidence of wrongdoing, he says he has done nothing wrong. People are so cynical these days, why not just trust him at his word?
But will that achieve anything beyond reminding the country about the allegations and reminding us all about his involvement with Epstein.
I won't be surprised if the photo below starts appearing on TV/Press reports tonight/tomorrow.
![]()
Can they put it back where the got it from snd 5 mins later appear with a valid warrant and seize it all again?If they got the search warrant wrong there should definitely be nothing that can be used as evidence against him.
If any potential case against him fails the fault lies squarely with the courts/police for cocking their job up.
Can they put it back where the got it from snd 5 mins later appear with a valid warrant and seize it all again?
If they got the search warrant wrong there should definitely be nothing that can be used as evidence against him.
If any potential case against him fails the fault lies squarely with the courts/police for cocking their job up.
BBC reporting along the lines of for now Police keep but don't use it and reapply to courts but using the correct law. BBC reporter saying legal experts have told her they are likely to be granted it applying under the correct law. Apparently that case is going to be heard next year and Prince Andrew's legal team will be fighting it.They shouldn't be allowed to.
Whether it's for the former Prince Andrew or Fred Bloggs.