Random political stuff - old news, or not news

[briantrumpet]

I'm putting this here, but I suspect that anyone reading it will immediately know which thread it should go in. Is there anyone else who would be so immediately identifiable from an AI analysis of a transcribed interview?

 

[First Aspect]

It's Stevo. Do I win?

 

[briantrumpet]

It's Stevo. Do I win?

Naughty!

 

[Pross]

I'm putting this here, but I suspect that anyone reading it will immediately know which thread it should go in. Is there anyone else who would be so immediately identifiable from an AI analysis of a transcribed interview?

View attachment 17619

Must be right as Super Intelligence says so.

 

[Beebo]

I'm putting this here, but I suspect that anyone reading it will immediately know which thread it should go in. Is there anyone else who would be so immediately identifiable from an AI analysis of a transcribed interview?

View attachment 17619

Boris Johnson used long words to appear clever.
Trump doesn’t have the vocabulary to do that, and I suspect the MAGA base aren’t really looking for that either. They just want basic concepts sold to them by Trump, who tells them how great they all are.

 

[briantrumpet]

Boris Johnson used long words to appear clever.
Trump doesn’t have the vocabulary to do that, and I suspect the MAGA base aren’t really looking for that either. They just want basic concepts sold to them by Trump, who tells them how great they all are.

Actually, I suspect that B Johnson might be recognisable in an 'analysis' like this, thanks to his use of random silly words and cod Latin.

 

[PurplePenguin]

I thought Boris's vocab was one of his better features.

 

[icowden]

I'm putting this here, but I suspect that anyone reading it will immediately know which thread it should go in. Is there anyone else who would be so immediately identifiable from an AI analysis of a transcribed interview?

Which AI was used to do it? Both Gemini and Copilot say that a speech transcript alone cannot be used to determine IQ. I asked them about Boris's leaving speech:

If you're asking specifically about the apparent intelligence level reflected in the writing style, I would say the speech is consistent with someone who has strong verbal intelligence and above-average general knowledge, but the text alone is nowhere near sufficient to distinguish, for example, an IQ of 110 from 130 or 150. The scientifically defensible conclusion is simply: IQ cannot be determined from this speech transcript.

 

[briantrumpet]

Which AI was used to do it? Both Gemini and Copilot say that a speech transcript alone cannot be used to determine IQ. I asked them about Boris's leaving speech:

Dunno, sorry. It was more that the supposed 'subject' was so identifiable that interested me. I don't think that would be the case if you tried it on, say, Cameron, May, Truss, Sunak, Starmer, Badenoch and Burnham.

 

[briantrumpet]

Well, that's a new analogy on me.

 

[bobzmyunkle]

 

[Pblakeney]

View attachment 17640

The statue itself is not especially significant. Where it is situated is significant.