First Aspect
Legendary Member
Curtice has been saying this for about 12 months. Sir John is an oracle.
I also wonder if there is a "French election" effect where in France (national elections) 1st round voters "take a punt" and often support more extreme candidates safe in the knowledge their chosen person won't get elected (yet). Then come 2nd round they realise the impact were the more extreme candidate get elected and revert to the more mainstream choice.
I also wonder if there is a "French election" effect where in France (national elections) 1st round voters "take a punt" and often support more extreme candidates safe in the knowledge their chosen person won't get elected (yet). Then come 2nd round they realise the impact were the more extreme candidate get elected and revert to the more mainstream choice.
Local Councillors are generally seen as having little power and most don't think their bin collections are at risk. So quite a few might see voting Reform for local councils "low risk". But faced with the prospect of their vote making Färage PM some will take a more sane route.
Or maybe I'm just wishful thinking not prepared to accept the prospect of Farāge becoming PM, deluding myself.
Lots of commentators talking about the end of our two party system yet I've not heard much about why it's got to the point it has. I suspect a large part because the two parties in the "two party system" have just failed. Poor policies and just chasing polls.I think that's what Starmer is (possibly foolishly) banking on.
Lots of commentators talking about the end of our two party system yet I've not heard much about why it's got to the point it has. I suspect a large part because the two parties in the "two party system" have just failed. Poor policies and just chasing polls.
As one (of many) example, I'd have hoped Starmer would have stood-up for asylum seekers, making speaches etc. about their plight, how we can help them without lowering our standards, how they contribute to the economy; smilarly rather than just condemn immigration instead talk about how dependent our NHS has become of people from overseas being prepared to come to the UK and care for us both under the NHS and social care. etc. Instead Starmer has just read the polling and taken the easy unthinking path.
Given how many people don't have the time to research and examine claims from politicians (busy work, family, etc.) I might turn that back to the politicians for creating those unreasonable expectations.But equally, I think voters are partially to blame for having unreasonable expectations of what national governments can achieve, blaming everything on incompetent dishonest politicians, when they keep on rewarding people who promise unicorns but deliver a pre-loved My Little Pony (slightly soiled). The bigger the lies, the bigger the electoral rewards.
Lots of commentators talking about the end of our two party system yet I've not heard much about why it's got to the point it has. I suspect a large part because the two parties in the "two party system" have just failed. Poor policies and just chasing polls.
As one (of many) example, I'd have hoped Starmer would have stood-up for asylum seekers, making speaches etc. about their plight, how we can help them without lowering our standards, how they contribute to the economy; smilarly rather than just condemn immigration instead talk about how dependent our NHS has become of people from overseas being prepared to come to the UK and care for us both under the NHS and social care. etc. Instead Starmer has just read the polling and taken the easy unthinking path.
I think a lot of voters just want to be told what they want to hear. However, when the Tories and Labour do that there is a track record showing they haven’t delivered whereas up until now Reform and the Greens haven’t been tested and the voters are still prepared to believe they’ll get the promised sunlit uplands promised by the new kids. If Reform win the next GE the reality will presumably start to bite and people will realise their promises are equally far fetched. I’d rather they come to that realisation through local elections first though.
Also, as next General election approaches what will the various press outlets have been holdimng ready to publish with max. impact?The trouble is that's already happened with Brexit, but once voters have gone against advice to give a kicking to the 'old order', they seem unwilling to reflect on how their choice has panned out, even when it's hit them personally. (See also Trump voters.)
Also, as next General election approaches what will the various press outlets have been holdimng ready to publish with max. impact?
But the switch to Reform run councils could give other parties plenty of stuff to use as in "They did this to your Council/Rates ... would you want this done to the entire country?". ie a track record of local Council disasters.I think there are plenty of studies to show that local elections are a very poor indicator for any sort of accurate prediction for the next general election. But it gives pundits plenty of (fairly meaningless) material nonetheless.