Reform, and the death of the Tory Party

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

midlandsgrimpeur

Senior Member
Jim Pickard
May 18, 2026 at 1:26 PM GMT+1

Nigel Farage’s claim that he paid for a £1.4mn house with his fee from a reality TV show has been challenged by corporate accounts that appear to show that the income remained on his company’s balance sheet after the property purchase. ft.com

The Reform leader told the FT last year that his earnings from the reality show were paid to his media company Thorn in the Side Ltd. Accounts for the company show its cash position increased from £300,000 on May 31 2023 to £1.7mn on May 31 2024 and suggest that no dividend was paid in the period.

Nimesh Shah, a tax expert at accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, reviewed the company accounts for the FT and said that they suggested money from Farage’s reality TV show appearance was not used to purchase the house. Shah said Reform’s claim that the house was purchased using money from the reality TV appearance fee “needs to be clarified because the company’s accounts are not consistent with their statement”. kudos to the brilliant @annasophiegross.bsky.social for following the money yet again

I am sure Chris Mason will be picking up on this for at least the next week and doing a good 5min segment on the 10pm news each night, forensically following the money and picking apart each and every inconsistency in Farage and Reform's statements on the matter...... oh wait......
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
I am sure Chris Mason will be picking up on this for at least the next week and doing a good 5min segment on the 10pm news each night, forensically following the money and picking apart each and every inconsistency in Farage and Reform's statements on the matter...... oh wait......

"Why Farage's £5mn from crypto billionaire Christopher Harbourne spells trouble for Starmer", by Chris Mason.
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
Might go either way. More (potential) dirt they find might encourage some to keep digging.

The suspect 2nd version of the £1.4m was on BBC 18:00 News (Chris Mason nowhere to be seen - maybe in meeting with editor arguing "Nothing to see here, but Starmer once parked for 40 mins in a free 30 mins without paying ...").
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Might go either way. More (potential) dirt they find might encourage some to keep digging.

The suspect 2nd version of the £1.4m was on BBC 18:00 News (Chris Mason nowhere to be seen - maybe in meeting with editor arguing "Nothing to see here, but Starmer once parked for 40 mins in a free 30 mins without paying ...").

BBC have got the new revelations on their main news page already, which is an improvement. Up till now it seems to have been a bit more of the "Well, everyone else is running it, so we probably ought to" vibe, on the Politics page.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c936nqy00rwo
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Psamathe

Legendary Member
Another lack of scrutiny (at least from what I've seen) is lots of noiseabout bond markets being nervous about Burnham and the fiscsl rules and Burnham having to make announcements to try and quell their fears yet Reform say nothing anout "fiscal anything" yet no press batting any eyelids, like something Reform tbs'ing and press moving on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Another lack of scrutiny (at least from what I've seen) is lots of noiseabout bond markets being nervous about Burnham and the fiscsl rules and Burnham having to make announcements to try and quell their fears yet Reform say nothing anout "fiscal anything" yet no press batting any eyelids, like something Reform tbs'ing and press moving on.

I gather that the bond markets are being savage on India at the moment, with the rupee at a record low... I assume that's all Reeves's fault too.
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
I gather that the bond markets are being savage on India at the moment, with the rupee at a record low... I assume that's all Reeves's fault too.
I think Burnham is right in that we should not be allowing these bond markets to determine our governance but we are a bit stuck with such high borrowing and needing ever more (loads more after Ms Reeves changed the rules to allow for loads more investment borrowing).
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
I think Burnham is right in that we should not be allowing these bond markets to determine our governance but we are a bit stuck with such high borrowing and needing ever more (loads more after Ms Reeves changed the rules to allow for loads more investment borrowing).

Isn't that what happened with Ms Lettuce?
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
Isn't that what happened with Ms Lettuce?
I was thinking more that I agree with Burnham in that our government policy should not be so determined by bond markets but politicians have limited what we can do sbout it in the short term.

Two aspects first we shouldn't be do dependent then separately how we reduce the dependency.

Truss's mistake was that she just ignored them ie got the second aspect (reducing dependency) completely wrong.

Like somebody declaring they shouldn't be paying their credit card so much interest each month but if they just ignored the card terms then expect big problems. They need to find smarter ways to improve their situation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Oops. But I'm sure it'll all be fine.

1779195931161.png
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Haha, I can't stop watching this. It would also work with Ernie Wise as Jenrick, and Eric Morecambe doing the trolling. It actually says a lot about Jenrick that he doesn't even find it funny. At least Thatcher joined in the fun if Dennis Skinner got in a zinger.



Superb, if HIGNFY is still on on Friday, this will surely feature.
 
Top Bottom