First Aspect
Guru
View: https://x.com/i/status/2001266360383316306
Drive, fly, boat, back of a pig, don't care get rid of them
HONK
View: https://x.com/i/status/2001266360383316306
Drive, fly, boat, back of a pig, don't care get rid of them
HONK
That's the total borrowing you utter moron.Government borrowing in 8 months this year £132 billion more than expected-no shît.
Will blow budget forecasts out of the water. Highest borrowing since post covid
That's the total borrowing you utter moron.
FTFYGovernment borrowing in 8 months this year £10 billion more than expected, but overall borrowing is falling under Labour, year on year.
No. It's more than expected, but not a lot more. Month on month, borrowing is falling.I know, but it's more than before
He was saying yesterday that he's passionate about reducing misogyny and violence against women. But it's hard to believe he's passionate about anything, so I just end up thinking he's got a script he learned.At one point I heard him comment about how this was a passion of his but then my mind just drifted away it was so dull.
Interesting appearance by Starmer being interviewed on C4 News yesterday. He managed to explain a large part of how Johnson was elected ... maybe demonstrated rather than explained. I'm sure whatever Starmer was saying was important but he was so un-engaging, so dull, I just didn't notice 90% of what he said (and I was alone without distractions). At one point I heard him comment about how this was a passion of his but then my mind just drifted away it was so dull.
Starmer's interview showed how the electorate pay no attention to such dull and un-engaging people and Johnson certainly was engaging, held your attention. But Starmer and nobody's listening, not holding anybodies attention.
And I still have no idea what Starmer was being interviewed about, that is is passion.
Interesting appearance by Starmer being interviewed on C4 News yesterday. He managed to explain a large part of how Johnson was elected ... maybe demonstrated rather than explained. I'm sure whatever Starmer was saying was important but he was so un-engaging, so dull, I just didn't notice 90% of what he said (and I was alone without distractions). At one point I heard him comment about how this was a passion of his but then my mind just drifted away it was so dull.
Starmer's interview showed how the electorate pay no attention to such dull and un-engaging people and Johnson certainly was engaging, held your attention. But Starmer and nobody's listening, not holding anybodies attention.
And I still have no idea what Starmer was being interviewed about, that is is passion.
To me his performance highlighted how Johnson got elected -as people were listening to him whereas Starmer, however clever or right or sensible his speeches/interviews if he so dull nobody pays any attention and it's like he's not there. I don't see it as "right" or "wrong" just maybe i understand better how anomalies like Johnson get elected - people listen and react positively.Each to their own. I'd rather have grey Major than charismatic BJ.