This is hurting my head.
It's just bollocks
Front the Economist -
The obr’s numbers looked broadly similar to those in the budget, though expected debt costs fell slightly. The real story, though, may be what the obr didn’t yet account for: sharply lower migration projections, which will constrain economic growth, and mounting pressure on the government to raise defence spending. Those questions could make the budget next autumn less boring than Ms Reeves would like.
It's not the statement of the bleedin' obvious I'm confused about, it's the fact that it's in the Telegraph.
It's a chance to have a go at Reeves, thoughjoined-upthinking isn't obviously present.
I don't see Trump laying into Starmer as anything to do with US-UK relationship rather it's a loyalty to Trũmp issue. Trūmp starting a war against Iran has not been through Congress, has not been justified under International Law, allies not forewarned or briefed on plans. It's the actions of just on individual, Trùmp. This is Trúmp expecting blind loyalty to him. He expects countries to demonstrate their blind loyalty to Trümp.It’s interesting to listen to the yanks bleating on about the “special relationship,” when it suits them,
After all, we have heard precious little from them when the UK has talked about it, in terms of tariffs etc.
If there is any special relationship under Trump’s term of office, it’s a one way special relationship.