I understand that guidance notes are relevant to the interpretation of statutes, because they relate to.the intended meaning of the person's who wrote the statutes. Is this really the case where a government just says things years after the fact? (It's a rhetorical question)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.