Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pblakeney

Legendary Member
OIP-3046363305.jpg
 

TailWindHome

Über Member
What I don't get about the whole Mandelson thing is, even as the graun delivers the standard issue Captain Mainwaring:

View attachment 14627

it also quotes, in the same article, one 'Ciaran Martin, a former senior civil servant with past involvement in vetting work', as saying:

View attachment 14628

So, which is it? Are they supposed to tell ministers or aren't they?


They've 2 options as it was explained to me

1 Clear the candidate- DV stays confidential

2 Refuse clearance - Tell the vettee's line manager why (who I'd guess is the Foreign Min in this case)(disclosure limited to precise reason for refusing)
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
What I don't get about the whole Mandelson thing is, even as the graun delivers the standard issue Captain Mainwaring:

View attachment 14627

it also quotes, in the same article, one 'Ciaran Martin, a former senior civil servant with past involvement in vetting work', as saying:

View attachment 14628

So, which is it? Are they supposed to tell ministers or aren't they?
Were I to be "interviewed" about some of my friends for Developed Vetting and politicians were to be told the results I'd say nothing. Politicians have the protection of Parliamentary Privilege and some use that protection. It can involve pretty detailed personal stuff and isn't only recent past. Politicians do politics and Developed Vetting has nothing to do with politics but is about how much an individual can be trusted. Politicians have no training nor talent to assess security risk and effective mitigation.
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
The mental contortions Trump supporters must go through to demand the resignation of a PM who appointed a friend of Epstein...

They dislocated all their mental joints a long time ago, so the contortions are no problem at all. Their brains are like a Picasso painting of a brain would be.
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Doesn't sound like Starmer was convincing from what I've read, and that Badenoch was pretty good. Even so, reckon he'll Klingon, but will go if local election results are as dire as might be.
 

spen666

Über Member
News, Current Affairs & Politics
Doesn't sound like Starmer was convincing from what I've read, and that Badenoch was pretty good. Even so, reckon he'll Klingon, but will go if local election results are as dire as might be.

The one thing that helps him is that there is no obvious successor at present
Burnham - not an MP
Angela - still got the HMRC business to get sorted
Wes - is he really a successor?
Ed Miliband - not sure he is credible with the country

Who else is there - hence Starmer continues to limp on
 

Pblakeney

Legendary Member
News, Current Affairs & Politics


The one thing that helps him is that there is no obvious successor at present
Burnham - not an MP
Angela - still got the HMRC business to get sorted
Wes - is he really a successor?
Ed Miliband - not sure he is credible with the country

Who else is there - hence Starmer continues to limp on

Fair.
"Exclude the impossible and what is left, however improbable, must be the truth."
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom