If they change leader they will be guilty of the same "silver bullet" thinking that is driving people to reform.I see Starmer is taking full responsibility (="I've said the words so no further action or changes").
Maybe worse is he's yet again using the same speech as previous electoral failures and leadership threats, going to go "further and faster" after a "reset".
And he's clinging on
Starmer vows to fight on as PM despite heavy local election losses for Labour.
I do wonder if now many backbench Labour MPs will be considering their own re-election prospects and that might make a leadership challenge more likely.
I would agree but then Starmer/Reeves is a disaster. But I can't see any of the leadership contenders being any less bad (ie they'd all be even worse). Periodically I think Burnham but I know nothing of his policies, capability, etc. so my brief periods of hope are that he's "none of the above" (a poor basis for such a post).If they change leader they will be guilty of the same "silver bullet" thinking that is driving people to reform.
Latest results have Reform ahead as predicted but Labour are still second.
Lib-Dems third and Conservatives fourth. Greens are way, way back off the scale. Reads like Reform have the biggest share, then a 3 way split.
It's *very* early though. Only 46 of 136 councils have declared and of those, only 5 have changed hands according to the BBC. Reform have taken one from Conservatives (unsurprising) and one from NIC.
(that's according to the map)
According to the results list labour have lost 8, conservatives have lost 1, Lib Dems gained 1 and reform gained 2. 6 have moved to NIC.
So whilst Reform may have gained a lot of councillors, it hasn't really put them in control of much.
They've been doing that in Worcestershire, as well as providing the highest council tax increase in the country, for the last year. Kent are no better. Let's see if the electorate are as perceptive as you hope.
Regarding Burnham, there was a rumour of the MP in the 'safe seat' of Bootle standing aside . . . Bootle went reform yesterday. Is there a 'safe' seat anywhere, for Burnham ?I would agree but then Starmer/Reeves is a disaster. But I can't see any of the leadership contenders being any less bad (ie they'd all be even worse). Periodically I think Burnham but I know nothing of his policies, capability, etc. so my brief periods of hope are that he's "none of the above" (a poor basis for such a post).
In a funny way, it will probably be the small stuff that trips them up. People seem to get very irate about bins, potholes, roadworks etc. whilst caring little about the big stuff. If anything will bring Reform down it could well be their (very likely) ineptitude at a local level.
I admire your optimism.
Never underestimate the strength of people's feelings about bins!
In a LOCAL election, it is the “little stuff” which counts (or should). My local councillor(s), we have 3 per ward here, have no influence over national policies, but, I do want them to attend to the “trivia”, ie potholes, litter, flytipping, ASB, dog fouling, etc etc
From Welsh results, so far, maybe PR didn’t pan out as Labour expected, and, it doesn’t seem to have prevented “extreme” parties gaining
From what I can see around here the problem is that councils were already providing pretty poor service due to austerity. Reform's incompetence can't make things much worse than they already were, so people are unlikely to notice.
OTOH, there are a lot of voters that relish the opportunity to be openly racist again.