icowden
Shaman
I suspect they'd have an argument (à la LoB) over whether it should be called the Islington People's Front or the Islington Peoples' Front.
Life imitates satire:-
I suspect they'd have an argument (à la LoB) over whether it should be called the Islington People's Front or the Islington Peoples' Front.
Life imitates satire:-
Unfortunately, we know who is responsible for this. And that's Corbyn. He's responsible for the people he's promoted to the heart of the new party, he's responsible for bringing the IA MPs into the fold while overlooking questionable and anti-working class aspects of their politics, and he's responsible for dragging his feet - even having to be bounced into starting a mailing list. The only thing preventing this from being a complete write off is that despite the shenanigans and stupidities, upwards of 50,000 people have joined - in the face of the serious alternative presented by the Greens. By all accounts, where regional assemblies are taking place members are showing up. And across the country, unofficial branches have convened. A dynamic independent of the centre's gatekeeping and the dithering is underway, and is refusing to be snuffed out by the idiocies leading figures keep inflicting on the project. Yes, it's hard to believe right now but this resilience shows Your Party, or whatever it will end up getting called, can come out the other side of these squabbles. It could overcome its over-dependence on Corbyn. It may yet realise its potential and have a great future ahead.
Ha, what a mess it all is.
https://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-your-party-debacle.html

Ha, what a mess it all is.
https://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-your-party-debacle.html
I've always thought Corbyn is not a leader, useless as one. But he is a good thinker and could do a far better job "back office" driving ideas. Trouble is, as with so many politicians these days, they want to be seen as being "in charge", to be making public appearances talking about "my Party" (like ownership) rather than what it really should be (a group of like minded people arguing for the same'ish outcome.)I think it has been pretty clear for a while that Corbyn is the central problem. He makes Starmer look magnanimous!
I still think there’s something disturbing about Corbyn probably going back to that GE campaign where he was surrounded by teenage ‘minders’.
I'm actually wondering if it'll end up with neither Sultana nor Corbyn in the party at this rate and I'll have to start a new thread.