To be fair I'm not really discussing the merits, more classifying them into a binary system.
Political partiesClassify away - right here
v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
So going off this ...Political parties
Political priorities
- Tories
- NotTories
- GTTO
- AOB
So going off this ...
View: https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1479477059940458499?t=8_msYoQzqCUXqftrVteTgQ&s=19
Have I got this right the Tories have defunded the NHS to the point where it doesn’t work properly, then Labour under Starmer want to privatise it ?
So going off this ...
View: https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1479477059940458499?t=8_msYoQzqCUXqftrVteTgQ&s=19
Have I got this right the Tories have defunded the NHS to the point where it doesn’t work properly, then Labour under Starmer want to privatise it ?
As well as Labour missing the bigger picture of a large proportion of the electorate who want NHS, public utilities back in public ownership.Is that privatisation?
Using private hospitals' capacity to do elective procedures like hip replacements isn't new and, if the price is right, seems a reasonable way to get waiting lists over the hump.
Is that privatisation?
Using private hospitals' capacity to do elective procedures like hip replacements isn't new and, if the price is right, seems a reasonable way to get waiting lists over the hump.
By that do you mean politicians getting their money/bungs/profits from the private healthcare companies ?Very true, but, someone may make a profit, we cannot have that, far better to have people housebound waiting for hip operations
By that do you mean politicians getting their money/bungs/profits from the private healthcare companies ?
I think the fear is that many politicians are owned by the private healthcare companies.Only if the Private Healthcare Companies are 100% owned by Politicians (I am sure no Labour Politician would be a share holder).