All uphill
Active Member
No more consent to being assaulted than you give by entering a pub, nightclub or shop
If I was a lawyer I reckon I could convincingly make the opposite argument (for a few thousand quid).
No more consent to being assaulted than you give by entering a pub, nightclub or shop
Well that's the point some are claiming you can commit online crimes. It also open's a can of worms, because someone playing from Iran has a differened set of norms than someone from Europe or the Us. Makes it a bit of an enforcement headacheNot sure what I think of this. There are a lot of "what if's" and grey areas. On the one hand you could say that online avatars are not people, or not physically connected to people, so cannot commit crimes, and if a person felt uncomfortable then they could take their VR headset off and report the user.
the simplier soluttion would be having an option in the game(settings) to block this. and or remove the possibilty completly (i haven't checked what kind of game this is, and or whterh completly remove would be viable)On the other hand, it is a virtual violation. It could also imply actual intent from the Vrapist so a reporting mechanism should be in place, much like that of someone boasting online that they can make a bomb to blow people up. It has to be treated as a real threat.
as long as the game is transparent in what kind of information each user sees, it's up to the user to protect his/her identity games do not have to be somekind of nanny right?This is at least not complying with online terms of use and is essentially bullinging. At worst it could be seen as threatening someone's safety. How is the user to know whether or not the VRapist intends to find out where they live and do it in real life?