World Cup 2026

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

First Aspect

Legendary Member
Having only seen said highlights I'm intrigued by this comment. Did you feel the officials were biased? From what I saw the red card was as clear as it gets and the penalty was a penalty. Not sure if there were other decisions that were more dubious though?
The sending off was indeed a sending off.

But a couple of England players were booked for talking to the ref after their penalty award, whereas the Mexican goalie delayed ours for about 5 minutes and one of their players basically lay on the penalty spot for 5 minutes, without consequence.

The award of the penalty was basically under crowd pressure and I don't think it was a penalty, frankly. Two players went for the ball so both feet were going in the same direction. It won't have hurt and 90% of the time it wouldn't be given, and certainly not overturned if the on pitch decision had been no penalty.
 

matticus

Legendary Member
Having been cycling for a week or so, I inadvertently found myself in a pub with a big screen for the Engerland v DRC match. When (from memory) Engerland went ahead I found myself rooting for plucky DRC to equalise. I left before that happened, but I gather the match got a bit exciting.
And now Engerland have apparently prolonged the agony by winning against Mexico. When's the first mountain stage?

Fortunately for DRC they lost that match, so have not "prolonged the agony". Perhaps send them a message of congratulation?

p.s. take yourself off to a pedantry thread for misspelling "England". x
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
An open goal, and Starmer even misses that. It's no wonder he can't do harder stuff.

1783341682805.png
 
  • Sad
Reactions: C R

Beebo

Legendary Member
UEFA is now challenging FIFA over the red card decision and their integrity.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c5yzzd73871o
 
Top Bottom