X

[Blazing Saddles]

Basil the Bollox more like.

 

[Xipe Totec]

Basil the Bollox more like.

Maybe Basil Bullshit doesn't think that accessing a huge database of illegal CSAM images that Grok's scoured from the foulest crevices of the internet, then telling the software to assemble a composite pseudo-photograph in the explicit pose of your choice, with your next-door neighbour's 9 year old daughter's face slapped onto it, somehow doesn't constitute a 'child sexual offence'

The CPS see this very differently, Basil and MAGAndy.

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2010765771928990134

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2011142467559575951

 

[Xipe Totec]

 

[Psamathe]

As noted above

Starmer says X is now reportedly complying with UK law in relation to Grok image abuse, which he says is welcome if true
Starmer said:

I have been informed this morning that X is acting to ensure full compliance with UK law. If so, that is welcome, but we’re not going to back down. They must act. We will take the necessary measures. We will strengthen existing laws and prepare for legislation if it needs to go further, and Ofcom will continue its independent investigation.

FURTHER UPDATE: Darlington was referring to this tweet about Grok changing its policy. We have not seen independent confirmation of it yet.

What I find surprising if Mr P had been discovered being involved in the production of Child Sexualised images, then once found out by law enforcement Mr P then said "OK, I won't produce any more" that would not be the end of the story. I suspect he'd still end-up in court.

 

[Hitchington]

Oh hai

 

[icowden]

New survey results:
https://yougov.co.uk/technology/art...-allowed-to-make-undressed-images-say-britons
One interesting result. 1% of people say that generating sexually explicit content of children should not be allowed but it's fine if they are in underwear, lingerie or bikinis...

 

[C R]

New survey results:
https://yougov.co.uk/technology/art...-allowed-to-make-undressed-images-say-britons
One interesting result. 1% of people say that generating sexually explicit content of children should not be allowed but it's fine if they are in underwear, lingerie or bikinis...
View attachment 12228

Our local MAGAt must have taken part in the survey.

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2011438952498995297

 

[Beebo]

So we now know that it’s not illegal to make AI child porn images in USA.
But abortion is illegal.
What a strange country.

 

[Blazing Saddles]

So we now know that it’s not illegal to make AI child porn images in USA.
But abortion is illegal.
What a strange country.

Women probably have more rights in Iran.
Still, what do you expect when the country is being run by a a paedo pervert dictator?

 

[CXRAndy]

So we now know that it’s not illegal to make AI child porn images in USA.
But abortion is illegal.
What a strange country.

Abortion is not illegal.

The legislation for abortion is governed by each individual state.

 

[icowden]

Women probably have more rights in Iran.
Still, what do you expect when the country is being run by a a paedo pervert dictator?

That's a bit harsh on the Ayatollah...

 

[matticus]

(wrong thread? Soz!)