X

[Ianonabike]

Interesting thing I learned thanks to twix today: most kidney transplants don’t replace the old kidneys. Surgeons usually leave the failed ones where they are and install the new kidney in the lower abdomen.

This was the tweet, which was fun to fact check:


View: https://x.com/Timmysofine/status/2008624090526200255

 

[TailWindHome]

 

[Rusty Nails]

X is not financially profitable for Musk, but he is so wealthy he thinks that it is a price worth paying as a platform for his political views, just like his pal Donnie with Truth Social.

 

[Ianonabike]

View: https://x.com/interesting_aIl/status/2008683034879328387

 

[Psamathe]

X is not financially profitable for Musk, but he is so wealthy he thinks that it is a price worth paying as a platform for his political views,...

Musk's trouble is he has investors who have invested to get a return not to provide Musk a pl;tform for his political views.

 

[icowden]

View: https://x.com/interesting_aIl/status/2008683034879328387

I'm now only seeing Andy as Colin...

 

[CXRAndy]

X is not financially profitable for Musk, but he is so wealthy he thinks that it is a price worth paying as a platform for his political views, just like his pal Donnie with Truth Social.

Its difficult to garner figures, with the company being private. Experts have said 𝕏 shows stability and steady growth after a few turbulent years post acquisition, buoyed by mergering Ai features into the platform.

E Musk has publicly said he bought it to create free speech platform, the money didn't matter. Accountants have indicated any losses could well have been used to offset profits taxes so the actual losses maybe far far smaller than speculated.

 

[TailWindHome]

steady growth after a few turbulent years post acquisition, buoyed by mergering Ai features into the platform.

The deepfake porn and child abuse generator is profitable

 

[Rusty Nails]

Its difficult to garner figures, with the company being private. Experts have said 𝕏 shows stability and steady growth after a few turbulent years post acquisition, buoyed by mergering Ai features into the platform.

E Musk has publicly said he bought it to create free speech platform, the money didn't matter. Accountants have indicated any losses could well have been used to offset profits taxes so the actual losses maybe far far smaller than speculated.

If you say so. You really do tie yourself in knots to rush to defend your hero, well both your heroes.

He has failed in his stated aim of making it a free speech platform for reasons outlined a couple of days ago. And I am sure experts say all sorts of things, often contradictory. Profits are often just around the corner, but as we both agree profit was not his priority in buying X.

 

[CXRAndy]

No knots

Guardian reports 𝕏 has raised $20bn with Ai Grok. Not a bad return on initial investment. Expect these figures to be dwarfed in the years to come

 

[TailWindHome]

No knots

Guardian reports 𝕏 has raised $20bn with Ai Grok. Not a bad return on initial investment. Expect these figures to be dwarfed in the years to come

I'm suprised you're so supportive of Musk's porn AI

I thought you wanted to protect 'our women and girls' from Africans

 

[Blazing Saddles]

I'm suprised you're so supportive of Musk's porn AI

I thought you wanted to protect 'our women and girls' from Africans

Ah, but if it’s good enough for Trump, it’s ok with CXRAndy.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Let's not pretend Twitter was wholesome before Musk bought it. Before all the ideological moderators were sacked Twitter banned anyone who said a man couldn't be a woman but allowed hundreds of pro paedophilia accounts and accounts with MAP Minor Attracted Person profiles.

Here's the nonces complaining about the post Musk Twitter clean up.

https://prostasia.org/blog/twitters-pedo-populism-setback-prevention/#:~:text=In October 2020, Twitter released,a step back into history.

Musk needs to do whatever he can to keep it off the platform but it's obvious that pornographic image creation was going to be the first port of call for a lot of AI users, just as it was when photography or cinematography was invented. It will be the case with all AI software and all platforms that allow image posting.

 

[CXRAndy]

I'm suprised you're so supportive of Musk's porn AI

I thought you wanted to protect 'our women and girls' from Africans

Im not supportive.

I've not seen, or would know how to do such a thing.

From what I understand you can tell Grok to create a virtual digital image, with the head of someone famous. Is that right?

So this is not OK right, from the Mirror?

I just want to make sure we are all in agreement

 

[Rusty Nails]

No knots

Guardian reports 𝕏 has raised $20bn with Ai Grok. Not a bad return on initial investment. Expect these figures to be dwarfed in the years to come

If you say so. Shows that allowing people to make and print abusive and quasi pornographic pictures of women pays. Is there no end to his greed for money.