AuroraSaab
Squire
Yeah, I take your point on that. I go to pubs regularly, but I wouldn't go to a small, crowded pub at the moment.
Fair enough.Yeah, I take your point on that. I go to pubs regularly, but I wouldn't go to a small, crowded pub at the moment.
There is evidence that sporting events provide a plausible reason for at least some of the increase in covid cases since the lifting of restrictions.I was about to ask you the same,
My point is that there seems to be no proof that since the grounds have been open, specifically, there has been a significant rise in cases.
This is a wind up right?But again, what's your point? How do you feel this is useful information, either your interpretation or mine?
I was about to ask you the same,
My point is that there seems to be no proof that since the grounds have been open, specifically, there has been a significant rise in cases.
Agree with the first part, do you really think people can't decide for themselves whether they want to wear masks or not irrespective of what Boris says or does?With 85% of the population now double jabbed with the booster rate picking up, there will come a point where the unvaccinated have had virus and either survived or died so that the 6000 people in hospital and 170 deaths a day from issues and complications due to Covid-19 is seen as a risk like any other health issue... presently there are 10000 people in hospital and 450 deaths a day from issues and complications due to heart disease.
With Boris Johnson's lack of judgement about the issues remaining, is it any wonder that people are not wearing masks or taking care not to infect others.
No, I'm genuinely asking what point you're trying to make. Your position seems to be that we don't know if football matches are safe. My position is that we have reasonable grounds, and evidence, to suggest that they may be unsafe. There is no interpretation consistent with football matches definitely being safe. Therefore as it's a deadly disease we're talking about, I suggest that it would be best to take a cautious approach and refrain from attending, or even holding, football matches with large crowds until we have better evidence or ways to make them safe.This is a wind up right?
As we don't have any evidence that cycling hasn't contributed to the spread of this deadly disease, perhaps we should all constrain ourselves to 30min rides from home maximum.No, I'm genuinely asking what point you're trying to make. Your position seems to be that we don't know if football matches are safe. My position is that we have reasonable grounds, and evidence, to suggest that they may be unsafe. There is no interpretation consistent with football matches definitely being safe. Therefore as it's a deadly disease we're talking about, I suggest that it would be best to take a cautious approach and refrain from attending, or even holding, football matches with large crowds until we have better evidence or ways to make them safe.
Agree with the first part, do you really think people can't decide for themselves whether they want to wear masks or not irrespective of what Boris says or does?
Well, now you mention that:Boris, when at a hospital, just needs to follow the rules.
There seems to be about the same level of consensus regarding the meaning of the words 'proof' and 'evidence' as there was for 'home' and 'local'.As we don't have any evidence that cycling hasn't contributed to the spread of this deadly disease, perhaps we should all constrain ourselves to 30min rides from home maximum.
Just like the good old days of 2020, eh jim?
Well, now you mention that:
in that recent - much tweeted - photo-op visit, did ANYONE actually say to him:
"Ah, Mr Prime Minister - you need to wear a mask, just like all the staff here?"
I'd really like to know!
'Twas ever thus.he doesn't give a toss
OK, well I shall hope that someone does, and posts here.While I don't know
OK, well I shall hope that someone does, and posts here.
If not, our ignorance shall continue ... c'est la vie ...