matticus
Guru
No, YOU smell. Ha!
Bread and Royal Circuses...
- Thread starter Fab Foodie
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
No, YOU smell. Ha!
BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
Clarkson has definitely gone too far with this, off my Christmas card list now.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/car...90afSI9ilLqRum6HaEr9K0otky3Xza9qLN7WADR0j5v5s
A
albion
Guest
Why?
He has always been a paid shrill. He is also known for hijacking the taxpayer paid BBC out of £100+ million.
He has always been a paid shrill. He is also known for hijacking the taxpayer paid BBC out of £100+ million.
Ian H
Legendary Member
A
albion
Guest
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...isogynic-fantasies-meghan-jeremy-clarkson-sun
Argument is that Murdoch has somehow managed to sink even further in the never ending pursuit of Meghan.
Argument is that Murdoch has somehow managed to sink even further in the never ending pursuit of Meghan.
BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
From the article " To the man who craves negative attention, there’s no such thing as a bad reaction.".
Perhaps, the sensible option is "don't react"? ie in forum terms, don't feed the troll ?
Just a thought.
A
albion
Guest
So you think Harry and Meghan should have stayed and/or bunkered down.
BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
You asking me?
If yes, I don't particularly have an opinion on if Harry and Meghan, stay or go, I don't much care. I have a slight preference for go, provided that means one (or two) less Royal hangers on. Perhaps they could take a few more of the Royals with them?
If no, then, kindly ignore this post.
D
Deleted member 49
Guest
Anyone think anything will change ? Nah
View: https://twitter.com/Nadine_Writes/status/1605163240169799680?t=jMW_-_tpeIkYZXwsl0K9bA&s=19
View: https://twitter.com/Nadine_Writes/status/1605163240169799680?t=jMW_-_tpeIkYZXwsl0K9bA&s=19
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
matticus
Guru
icowden
Squire
I think the key difference is that Danny Baker immediately recognised the way that the tweet had been interpreted, explained what his thinking was at the time, apologised and deleted the tweet.
Clarkson on the other hand, didn't just quickly tweet a picture, he wrote a column and spent some time writing some quite unpleasant stuff about Markle. There was no "mistake" in his thoughts. The only "mistake" was that he thought he was being funny. But - loads of publicity for Murdoch's rags, so no need to sack him.
BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
You could be right. But, since I didn't make any reference to Clarkson (other than in a much later post, which you haven't quoted), I don't quite get the correlation?
icowden
Squire
Just expounding on the difference between DB and JC based on what you and others had already posted...
BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
Since Danny Baker lost his career, and Clarkson's appears to be on an upward trajectory, the moral of the story would appear to be "be a Clarkson"?
