Stevo 666
Well-Known Member
If you are reduced to semantics to make your point ...
I'm not. Have another read of the point, it's clear enough.
There's a clue in the word 'country' 😉
Last edited:
If you are reduced to semantics to make your point ...
You're doing that Brevity thing of denying that the EU Single Market is a single market. Anyway, the US is shutting up shop, so it's moot anyway.
The point is clear enough.
The EU is a group of countries who sign up to some similar rules. And which country do we trade most with?
The US is the largest single country we trade with.
The EU is by far the largest single trading partner we have.
Trade with the EU is more important financially to us than trade with the US.
The total volume of trade with the US will never exceed the total volume of with the EU (whether it is a single trading entity or separate trading entities)...unless they tow this island a few thousand miles west.
What is your point?
What you said above in the first two lines of your post, then once Mr. Trumpet has acknowledged this fact, I like him to explain how that fits in with his post above on page 33 about the gravity theory of trade. Which I've already asked.
The Gravity Model is theory, not a set of definitive rules, and factors other than distance affect this model:
"While the US is far from the UK, the gravity model also considers factors like shared history and language that can reduce trade friction, leading to more trade than predicted solely by distance.
The model also acknowledges the importance of other factors like shared language, historical ties, and similar cultures, which can reduce trade barriers and increase trade flows between countries like the UK and the US, despite their distance."
I think you need to make Brian aware that it's about more than just being geographically close.
Nothing I read in his post makes me think he is not aware of that.
And it does not stop points 3 & 4 in my post from being true.
I didnt say they weren't.
Anyway, I'm sure Brian will welcome your help on this but I'm asking him the question.
And he didn't not seem to realise the identity of our largest trading partner until I pointed this out, which may explain his reluctance to answer my question.
Happy to let Mr Nails answer, as this is a public forum.
Our largest trading partner is the EU Steveo! Not the US.I didnt say they weren't.
Anyway, I'm sure Brian will welcome your help on this but I'm asking him the question.
And he didn't not seem to realise the identity of our largest trading partner until I pointed this out, which may explain his reluctance to answer my question.
The Gravity Model is theory, not a set of definitive rules, and factors other than distance affect this model:
"While the US is far from the UK, the gravity model also considers factors like shared history and language that can reduce trade friction, leading to more trade than predicted solely by distance.
The model also acknowledges the importance of other factors like shared language, historical ties, and similar cultures, which can reduce trade barriers and increase trade flows between countries like the UK and the US, despite their distance."
The other key trade detail is that the only significant products that America has to sell are oil, gas, soybeans and weaponry.
We can knock weaponry off the list as they can no longer be trusted.
US Oil and Gas are not needed as there are plenty of other vendors.
Soybeans can be obtained from Brazil.
The USA needs trade with the rest of the world because it imports almost everything outside of grain and meat/dairy. They need our machinery, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, scientific instruments etc, They need all their chips and tech from China. They need our Whiskey etc.
Trump seems to be blind to the fact that if you don't have anything anyone really wants, you aren't in a position to demand better deals.