bobzmyunkle
Über Member
Keilder to Lincolnshire, that's a lot of lead. More aesthetic than pylons though.I vaguely remember from my history lessons, the Romans had a means of doing this, was it something about aqueducts?
Keilder to Lincolnshire, that's a lot of lead. More aesthetic than pylons though.I vaguely remember from my history lessons, the Romans had a means of doing this, was it something about aqueducts?
Keilder to Lincolnshire, that's a lot of lead. More aesthetic than pylons though.
Is the problem not that the water is in the "wrong" place?
For example, there is a massive reservoir at Kielder, built to service a Steel Plant on Teesside that never materialised, but, all that water in Northumberland is of little use to those in (say) Linconshire, if it cannot be easily and inexpensively transported.
I vaguely remember from my history lessons, the Romans had a means of doing this, was it something about aqueducts?
I'm fairly certain that it rains in Lincolnshire as well as Kielder.
I'm fairly certain that it rains in Lincolnshire as well as Kielder.
I think it rains more in some places than others.
But on the map in the BBC article our reservoirs are fine. It's Wales and the North that have the problem. We have loads of big reservoirs in the South East because we get less rain There are fewer in Wales and the North because traditionally it's always raining.A problem is that the driest area of the England (the South East) rain-wise has very few reservoirs and the highest population.
I think it rains more in some places than others.
But on the map in the BBC article our reservoirs are fine. It's Wales and the North that have the problem. We have loads of big reservoirs in the South East because we get less rain There are fewer in Wales and the North because traditionally it's always raining.
But on the map in the BBC article our reservoirs are fine. It's Wales and the North that have the problem. We have loads of big reservoirs in the South East because we get less rain There are fewer in Wales and the North because traditionally it's always raining.
But on the map in the BBC article our reservoirs are fine. It's Wales and the North that have the problem. We have loads of big reservoirs in the South East because we get less rain There are fewer in Wales and the North because traditionally it's always raining.
I was trying to find figures for water storage per head of population for the various areas, but failed. But I think that the whole of the SE has the same number of large reservoirs as the whole of the SE, despite the massive difference in population. IIRC, the SE relies more heavily on groundwater aquifers.
Saw a documentary on TV a few days ago about the OceanGate sub tragedy. That sort of highlighted the shortcomings of the "move fast and break things" approach to testing. There were other failings which only emerged into public domain after the tragedy.It’s one of the failings of the "move fast and break things" - each "break" finds one thing. Next break finds the fault that would have happened last time had a different break not happened first.
Plus it only finds catastrophic failures, not those that "didn’t quite come to light this time ... but when you put humans aboard".
How would the airline industry have developed if every aircraft shortcoming meant an aircraft full of passengers falling out of the sky.
Some things take time and cost money to develop. Doesn't mean we've got it right waiting for catastrophic failures to identify shortcomings isn't necessary better.
Ian
Saw a documentary on TV a few days ago about the OceanGate sub tragedy. That sort of highlighted the shortcomings of the "move fast and break things" approach to testing. There were other failings which only emerged into public domain after the tragedy.
Ian