briantrumpet
Über Member
Perhaps the more philosophical/existential argument, but one I fully agree with. The problem with the "tech bros" is that their fascination is with making money through new technology and they have hit on the (rather successful) formula that the way to do this is to make basic human functions and experiences "simpler". As you point out, the problem is that much of this erodes human agency and personal interaction which seems to have the largely obvious consequence of diminishing the human experience (whilst convincing most that it actually enhances it).
I don't think it's "philosophical/existential" any more than it would be to say that it would be detrimental to the human body to let machines do our physical exercise for us: if we don't use our bodies and brains the way they've evolved to be to deal with the physical and cognitive challenges that surround us, they just won't be equipped well to deal with those challenges.
The absolute miracle of the human brain is that we are born with one which is only minimally pre-programmed, and it relies on its interaction with its environment to achieve its full potential. Deny it an essential part of that interaction, and it'll have a big gap in its capabilities and ability to conceptualise.