Does it? Because Rupert Lowe is a f*ckwit.
But then you and your rightiebollox chums think we're enamoured by Starmer.
Pro tip - we aren't.
It knows, it doesn't care, don't feed it.
You mean Starmers BSBut then I feel like his bullsh!t needs challenged
What's my son got to do with it?If you're mad about politicians I feel bad for you son,
I got 99 problems but Keir Starmer ain't one.
That's why I rarely directly quote him.
But then I feel like his bullsh!t needs challenged.
It is angling for challenge. Ignoring it gets under its sin.
There is no skill involved in posting others material. Material that makes little sense to begin with.Exactly this. It's really not a complicated concept to grasp, but the skill of a determined troll means that people think that just a few more rebuttals will make him see sense.
The evidence of hundreds and hundreds of posts suggests otherwise: he just gets worse, because that's what gets most responses. Pointless pixel pooping.
If that was the case your feeble phrases would have devastated me, I would have left moons agoIt is angling for challenge. Ignoring it gets under its sin.
There is no skill involved in posting others material. Material that makes little sense to begin with.
It's more the old adage of "never argue with an idiot" being proven.
But an effective troll will also occasionally post vaguely sane stuff to draw people back in
It is angling for challenge. Ignoring it gets under its sin.
I'm not new at forums.
And I understand where both you and @briantrumpet are coming from.
Like I said, I don't directly quote or respond but there are times when the posts deserve a response.
I don't think that's feeding, it's the only version of actual moderation we have on here.