briantrumpet
Legendary Member
Not really news, but an interesting take on the differences between the US and Europe, from an American who moved to London and didn't want to go back.
Not really news, but an interesting take on the differences between the US and Europe, from an American who moved to London and didn't want to go back.
My only complaint is that his constantly waving hands made it difficult to concentrate on the sub-titles.
Not really news, but an interesting take on the differences between the US and Europe, from an American who moved to London and didn't want to go back.
His view is not unique either. I have seen several videos of Americans who moved to the UK or to mainland Europe, who now view their home country from a very different perspective.
Being "brainwashed" into believing the US is the greatest country in the world for health, education, discoveries etc., and anybody who disagrees with that is wrong, is commonly used either directly or strongly implied.
I am sure there are Americans over here and in Europe, who believe that the UK and Europe is too socialist, that less gun laws are needed and that people live to work not work to live. But for some reason they appear to be a less vocal about it.
Interesting Dan Neidle post on whether Carter-Ruck should be in the dock for not just defending a fraudulent blockchain 'company' (OneCoin - actually a Ponzi scheme), but trying to silence all reporting on it, despite the fact they hadn't got satisfactory answers to the questions required by Know Your Client laws.
https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/10/19/carter-ruck-onecoin-fraud-crime/
View attachment 10584
Always enjoy reading Dan's threads; informative yet easy to digest/comprehend.
Reminds me of the time when he appeared on BBC News to discuss Nadhim Zahawi's tax affairs, and Nina Warhurst decided to introduce him as a Labour Supporting Tax Lawyer. #BBCBias
View: https://x.com/simonjmason/status/1617085231940665345?t=gdvcNuGfHadCpRz0a4xLkA&s=19
To be fair, he is a Labour supporter (or has been), but he doesn't hide that, nor does that prevent him from looking into Labour proposals or politicians critically. He does manage to make tax policies and their application accessible and interesting, as well as annoying @PurplePenguin (for reasons I've never fully understood). He'd done good pieces on the idiotic cliff-edge taxes that the complicated UK allowances & rates result in (not that I'm ever going to get near those cliff edges on my income level).
To be fair, he is a Labour supporter (or has been), but he doesn't hide that, nor does that prevent him from looking into Labour proposals or politicians critically. He does manage to make tax policies and their application accessible and interesting, as well as annoying @PurplePenguin (for reasons I've never fully understood). He'd done good pieces on the idiotic cliff-edge taxes that the complicated UK allowances & rates result in (not that I'm ever going to get near those cliff edges on my income level).
My beef was the wording used, and it's 'implication'. Not a tax Lawyer and a Labour member; but a Labour supporting tax lawyer.
Little things like this are important IMO.
I think he is overconfident and tries to sensationalise everything. In that, he is far from alone on the internet, but he then manages to write lengthy quite dull "articles" (mostly just a series of tweets) which seem to be lapped up his followers.
For example, he confidently states cryptocurrency can't be centralised which just shows a lack of understanding. Ripple, for example, is centralised.
Is Dan Niedle the guy who always messes with the axes on graphs to exaggerate and misrepresent?