First Aspect
Legendary Member
There's no need to be so mean.As you know, I'm just not as amazing as you. My expertise knows bounds.
There's no need to be so mean.As you know, I'm just not as amazing as you. My expertise knows bounds.
This is an interesting read on the Manchester school librarian who lost her job because books she added to her school library were deemed as safeguarding breaches, including one by Michelle Obama, and a picture-book version of 1984.
https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2...school-library-censorship-who-is-accountable/
Ha, their FB banner "Proud to be GOOD" amuses me, given that 'Good' is only one step up from 'Requires improvement' in old money, and is the equivalent of what used to be called, euphemistically, 'Adequate'.
View attachment 14249
Academisation is a big scandal waiting to be exposed. There are many aspects to it, from ideological groups gaining control os schools without scrutiny like in this case to the salaries being paid to the "executive" teams.
Rest assured that we are now as well prepared as we were in 2019.
Yes it always baffles me. I've seen a number of schools advertising their "Good" status.Ha, their FB banner "Proud to be GOOD" amuses me, given that 'Good' is only one step up from 'Requires improvement' in old money, and is the equivalent of what used to be called, euphemistically, 'Adequate'.
Academisation is a big scandal waiting to be exposed. There are many aspects to it, from ideological groups gaining control of schools without scrutiny like in this case to the salaries being paid to the "executive" teams.
Ha, their FB banner "Proud to be GOOD" amuses me, given that 'Good' is only one step up from 'Requires improvement' in old money, and is the equivalent of what used to be called, euphemistically, 'Adequate'.
View attachment 14249
Do these ratings have any real meaning, when the words to describe them are subverted?
If every school we "good", then, to stand out, a school would have to be "Very Good", when they are all "Very Good", we would have to introduce "very, very good" and so on.
It is the same pointless exercise which gave us "A" level grades of A, A*, and so on.
Also, the same madness which gave us everyone having a degree, it then becomes necessary to have a Masters, or Phd or whatever to stand out from the "crowd".
Quite. It was just as daft when 'Satisfactory' in effect meant 'Not satisfactory'. They want everyone to be above average, and they want to show that educational achievements are relentlessly improving as a result of their endless tinkering.
Who are "they"?
But, in essence, I would agree, same thing in the NHS, endless tinkering and fiddling of waiting times etc to produce fictitious improvements.
Do these ratings have any real meaning, when the words to describe them are subverted?
If every school we "good", then, to stand out, a school would have to be "Very Good", when they are all "Very Good", we would have to introduce "very, very good" and so on.
It is the same pointless exercise which gave us "A" level grades of A, A*, and so on.
Also, the same madness which gave us everyone having a degree, it then becomes necessary to have a Masters, or Phd or whatever to stand out from the "crowd".