BRFR Cake Stop 'breaking news' miscellany

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pblakeney

Squire
I haven't read the article, but I'm quite enjoying the reactions to Burn-Murdoch's article arguing that the rise of mobile telephony from 2008 has led to the decrease in the number children being born around the world. Has he spotted something, or is this like the book of spurious correlations?

View attachment 15186

I would have thought Tinder might have brought the opposite result.
Just shows how little I know.
 

icowden

Pharaoh
I haven't read the article, but I'm quite enjoying the reactions to Burn-Murdoch's article arguing that the rise of mobile telephony from 2008 has led to the decrease in the number children being born around the world. Has he spotted something, or is this like the book of spurious correlations?
The chart is showing the drop off in teen pregnancies largely. In women between 15 to 19 years of age birth rate fell 71% between 2007 and 2024. For 20-24 year olds 43%. 25-29 year olds by 23%.

So it largely reflects that teenage pregnancies have dropped hugely and people are tending to wait to their 30s.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
The chart is showing the drop off in teen pregnancies largely. In women between 15 to 19 years of age birth rate fell 71% between 2007 and 2024. For 20-24 year olds 43%. 25-29 year olds by 23%.

So it largely reflects that teenage pregnancies have dropped hugely and people are tending to wait to their 30s.

Are the figures broken down by Socio-economic groups?

Personally I don't see a fall in teenage pregnancies as an undesirable development.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
Are the figures broken down by Socio-economic groups?

Personally I don't see a fall in teenage pregnancies as an undesirable development.

I was thinking the same. Teen pregnancy has been horribly stigmatised over the years, but now it's somehow a bad thing that it's falling off?

Yours, confusedly,
A Teenage Dad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Wow, why has no-one ever thought of this before in London?

1779111945158.png


Well, apart from:

ondon-Bridge-with-the-Water-Works-in-the-Year-1749.jpg
 

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh

I thought that was quite an interesting article.
It gave both sides rather than the usual 'You got everything on a plate' or 'We lived in a hole in t'road and were grateful for it'.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
It is really disappointing to see already-debunked fake posts shared by prominent people (Hamill has 1.3mn followers on Bluesky). I'm annoyed enough if I do it, but there's even less of an excuse for someone of Hamill's reach. It's even more annoying when it's pointed out and they don't take the post down and apologise. There's enough Trumpshit out there without making stuff up.

1779127560819.png
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Wow, why has no-one ever thought of this before in London?

View attachment 15191

Well, apart from:

View attachment 15192

A bit smaller scale:

I thought that was quite an interesting article.
It gave both sides rather than the usual 'You got everything on a plate' or 'We lived in a hole in t'road and were grateful for it'.

Yes, I agree, but, I did think someone born in 1962 claiming to be a "baby boomer" was pushing it a little. 😊
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Full paper is here:
https://homepages.uc.edu/~moscoshn/Personal_webpage/papers/Smartphone_web.pdf

Well no. Exactly. There is however an upswing in teen suicides which is a less useful outcome.

Not sure that I agree that a reduction in births equates with a reduction in fertility, maybe it reflects more effective availability and use of contraception (ie, maybe all of those sex education lessons actually worked).

Any fathers of teenage girls may wish to skip the next part.....

Remembering my teenage years, (1960 - 1967, the so called swinging 60s) getting a shag was a major part of my waking efforts. Even if you struck lucky, you then had the problem of where (parents, at least mine, were unlikely to countenance the latest conquest, staying the night, or, even an hour of unsupervised "fun"). I don't believe that the average teenage boy's desire is any different (although, I agree, there may be more distractions, but, IMHO, none compare), so, I assume that the same amount of shagging is going on now, as it was in the 60s (maybe more). My theory is that the youth of today are better informed on how to avoid pregnancy, the means are more readily available, and, parental attitudes are more likely to allow "civilised" shagging.
 

Pblakeney

Squire
Not sure that I agree that a reduction in births equates with a reduction in fertility, maybe it reflects more effective availability and use of contraception (ie, maybe all of those sex education lessons actually worked).
I'm fairly sure that there has been scientific studies showing that fertility is dropping.
Sperm count in particular.
 
Top Bottom