The Court of the twitter mob - the professionally offended - seems to have decided it does, so that verdict settles the matter.
It seems to me that what we have here is a tactless old lady possibly with a vestige of British Empire type racism, although no-one can be sure of that. I don't think being tactless is a moral virtue, but I'm not sure it deserves the reaction is has got.
On the other hand we have ageism (she's old), classism (she's attached to the court), and racism (she's white). No prejudice there then! We will see if this is the woke religion at work if she apologises but is never forgiven.
The vast bulk of any 'ageism' has come from people trying to excuse Lady Husseys behaviour by saying that she can't be expected to know any better, because she's over eighty.
Which is a pretty pathetic excuse, and insulting to older people.
'Professionally offended' what does that even mean ??
Same as 'woke religion'
This is all straight out of DT comments section.
You don't have to be on twitter to get that the conversation was about putting ms Fulani in her place, and that it only took place because of her appearance and the prejudgements that Lady Hussey drew from that.
Her sense of entitlement meant that she kept on persisting with her interrogation, long after any kind of decently adjusted social awareness switch would have turned her mouth off.
'Woke' is a routine slur chucked at people who are making some kind of effort to be socially aware, who are having some empathy for people who are not them.
As a religious person yourself I'd have thought you'd approve such efforts to have empathy - but I guess that's me 'prejudging' right there..
As for making out the poor old white upper classes are being oppressed ??
Pull the other one mate, no one's buying that, are they? 🙄